Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18294288›Full record

ReviewCancer science2008

Pharmacokinetic considerations regarding non-viral cancer gene therapy.

Makiya Nishikawa, Yoshinobu Takakura, Mitsuru Hashida

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer science, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Makiya NishikawaDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Drug Metabolism, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. makiya@pharm.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Yoshinobu Takakura
Mitsuru Hashida
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer gene therapy, in which pharmacologically active compounds are administered to cancer patients in a genetic form, has been examined not only in animals but also in cancer patients. Viral vector-induced severe side effects in patients have greatly underscored the importance of non-viral gene transfer methods. Even though the importance of pharmacokinetics is undoubtedly understood in the development of anticancer therapies, its importance has been less well recognized in non-viral cancer gene therapy. When transgene products express their activity within transduced cells, such as herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase and short hairpin RNA, the pharmacokinetics of the vectors and the expression profiles of the transgenes will determine the efficacy of gene transfer. The percentage of cells transduced is highly important if few by-stander effects are expected. If transgene products are secreted from cells into the blood circulation, such as interferons and interleukins, the pharmacokinetics of transgenes becomes a matter of significant importance. Then, any approach to increasing the level and duration of transgene expression will increase the therapeutic effects of cancer gene therapy. Here we review the pharmacokinetics of both non-viral vectors and transgene products, and discuss what should be done to achieve safer and more effective non-viral cancer gene therapy.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyTransgenesGenetic VectorsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID18294288
PMCPMC11158855
OpenAlexW2138118556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.