Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18293103›Full record

ReviewChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2008

Primate chromosome evolution: ancestral karyotypes, marker order and neocentromeres.

R Stanyon, M Rocchi, O Capozzi, R Roberto, D Misceo, M Ventura, M F Cardone, F Bigoni, N Archidiacono

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Origin and evolution of acrocentric chromosomes in human and great apes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Telomerase misbehaves after a breakup.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Chromosome Painting inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R StanyonDepartment of Animal Biology and Genetics, Laboratory of Anthropology, Via del Proconsolo 12, 50122, Florence, Italy. roscoe.stanyon@unifi.it
M Rocchi
O Capozzi
R Roberto
D Misceo
M Ventura
M F Cardone
F Bigoni
N Archidiacono

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1992 the Japanese macaque was the first species for which the homology of the entire karyotype was established by cross-species chromosome painting. Today, there are chromosome painting data on more than 50 species of primates. Although chromosome painting is a rapid and economical method for tracking translocations, it has limited utility for revealing intrachromosomal rearrangements. Fortunately, the use of BAC-FISH in the last few years has allowed remarkable progress in determining marker order along primate chromosomes and there are now marker order data on an array of primate species for a good number of chromosomes. These data reveal inversions, but also show that centromeres of many orthologous chromosomes are embedded in different genomic contexts. Even if the mechanisms of neocentromere formation and progression are just beginning to be understood, it is clear that these phenomena had a significant impact on shaping the primate genome and are fundamental to our understanding of genome evolution. In this report we complete and integrate the dataset of BAC-FISH marker order for human syntenies 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22 and the X. These results allowed us to develop hypotheses about the content, marker order and centromere position in ancestral karyotypes at five major branching points on the primate evolutionary tree: ancestral primate, ancestral anthropoid, ancestral platyrrhine, ancestral catarrhine and ancestral hominoid. Current models suggest that between-species structural rearrangements are often intimately related to speciation. Comparative primate cytogenetics has become an important tool for elucidating the phylogeny and the taxonomy of primates. It has become increasingly apparent that molecular cytogenetic data in the future can be fruitfully combined with whole-genome assemblies to advance our understanding of primate genome evolution as well as the mechanisms and processes that have led to the origin of the human genome.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene OrderAnimalsCentromereChromosomes, MammalianGenetic MarkersHumansKaryotypingPrimatesGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.