Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18292986›Full record

SynthesisDiabetologia2008

Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

C R Cardwell, L C Stene, G Joner, O Cinek, J Svensson, M J Goldacre, R C Parslow, P Pozzilli, G Brigis, D Stoyanov and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diabetologia, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06282952 (Section-Born Infants and SUccessful Health Outcomes After Fecal Microbiota Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 232 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
232citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06282952 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Section-Born Infants and SUccessful Health Outcomes After Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (SISU-FMT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOulu University HospitalRan2026 to 2036Enrolled460ConditionsFecal Microbiota Transplantation, Cesarean Section, Overweight and ObesityArmsDonor-derived fecal microbiota transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

232 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 590 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Health outcomes following caesarean birth- An observational study of twins discordant for mode of delivery.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

172 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

C R CardwellDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen's University Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, UK. c.cardwell@qub.ac.uk
L C Stene
G Joner
O Cinek
J Svensson
M J Goldacre
R C Parslow
P Pozzilli
G Brigis
D Stoyanov
B Urbonaite
S Sipetić
E Schober
C Ionescu-Tirgoviste
G Devoti
C E de Beaufort
K Buschard
C C Patterson
Queen's University Belfast · GBCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUCharles University · CZMedical University of Vienna · ATNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NORiga Stradiņš University · LVRigshospitalet · DKSteno Diabetes Center · DKUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe aim of this study was to investigate the evidence of an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes in children born by Caesarean section by systematically reviewing the published literature and performing a meta-analysis with adjustment for recognised confounders.

methodsAfter MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE searches, crude ORs and 95% CIs for type 1 diabetes in children born by Caesarean section were calculated from the data reported in each study. Authors were contacted to facilitate adjustments for potential confounders, either by supplying raw data or calculating adjusted estimates. Meta-analysis techniques were then used to derive combined ORs and to investigate heterogeneity between studies.

resultsTwenty studies were identified. Overall, there was a significant increase in the risk of type 1 diabetes in children born by Caesarean section (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.32, p < 0.001). There was little evidence of heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.54). Seventeen authors provided raw data or adjusted estimates to facilitate adjustments for potential confounders. In these studies, there was evidence of an increase in diabetes risk with greater birthweight, shorter gestation and greater maternal age. The increased risk of type 1 diabetes after Caesarean section was little altered after adjustment for gestational age, birth weight, maternal age, birth order, breast-feeding and maternal diabetes (adjusted OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.36, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThis analysis demonstrates a 20% increase in the risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes after Caesarean section delivery that cannot be explained by known confounders.

Indexed as

AdultAge of OnsetBirth OrderBirth WeightCesarean SectionChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal AgePregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID18292986
OpenAlexW2165387067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.