Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18292777›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2008

MYC in mammalian epidermis: how can an oncogene stimulate differentiation?

Fiona M Watt, Michaela Frye, Salvador Aznar Benitah

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ontogeny of Skin Stem Cells and Molecular Underpinnings.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Manipulating Myc for reparative regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Myc-dependent dedifferentiation of Gata6Nature cell biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona M WattCancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK. fiona.watt@cancer.org.uk
Michaela Frye
Salvador Aznar Benitah
Barcelona Biomedical Research Park · ESCancer Research UK · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK A10212Cancer Research UK A3602Cancer Research UK A7006Cancer Research UK A7989Medical Research Council G0600796Medical Research Council G0600796(78769)Medical Research Council G1100073Wellcome Trust 079894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MYC in human epidermal stem cells can stimulate differentiation rather than uncontrolled proliferation. This discovery was, understandably, greeted with scepticism by researchers. However, subsequent studies have confirmed that MYC can stimulate epidermal stem cells to differentiate and have shed light on the underlying mechanisms. Two concepts that are relevant to cancer have emerged: first, MYC regulates similar genes in different cell types, but the biological consequences are context-dependent; and second, MYC activation is not a simple 'on/off' switch - the cellular response depends on the strength and duration of MYC activity, which in turn is affected by the many cofactors and regulatory pathways with which MYC interacts.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticOncogenesAnimalsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationChromatinEpidermisHumansKeratinocytesMiceModels, BiologicalProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSkin NeoplasmsChromatinProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID18292777
PMCPMC2494614
OpenAlexW2011019484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.