Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18292212›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2008

Reciprocal intraepithelial interactions between TP63 and hedgehog signaling regulate quiescence and activation of progenitor elaboration by mammary stem cells.

Na Li, Samer Singh, Pratima Cherukuri, Hua Li, Ziqiang Yuan, Leif W Ellisen, Baolin Wang, David Robbins, James DiRenzo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Targeting Lipid Metabolism in Cancer Stem Cells for Anticancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The dual role of p63 in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. p63-related signaling at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. p63 at the Crossroads between Stemness and Metastasis in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Na LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Dartmouth Medical School, 7650 Remsen, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA.
Samer Singh
Pratima Cherukuri
Hua Li
Ziqiang Yuan
Leif W Ellisen
Baolin Wang
David Robbins
James DiRenzo
Dartmouth College · USCornell University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
P63 mediators as therapeutic targets in HNSCCR01DE015945 · NIDCR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ELLISEN, LEIF W · 2004 to 2021
$6.9M
Role of DN-p63 in Preservation of Self RenewalR01CA108539 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI DIRENZO, JAMES · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA108539-04)NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108539NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TP63 is required for preservation of epithelial regenerative stasis and regulates the activity of diverse genetic pathways; however, specific effector pathways are poorly understood. Data presented here indicate that reciprocal regulatory interactions between hedgehog signaling and TP63 mediate stage-specific effects on proliferation and clonigenicity of separable enriched mammary stem and progenitor fractions. Analysis of DeltaN-p63 and TA-p63 indicates segregated expression in mammary stem and progenitor fractions, respectively, demonstrating that differential TP63 promoter selection occurs during elaboration of mammary progenitors by mammary stem cells. This segregation underlies mammary progenitor-specific expression of Indian Hedgehog, identifying it as a binary transcriptional target of TP63. Hedgehog activation in vivo enhances elaboration of mammary progenitors and decreases label retention within mammary stem cell-enriched fractions, suggesting that hedgehog exerts a mitogenic effect on mammary stem cells. Hedgehog signaling promotes differential TP63 promoter usage via disruption of Gli3 or Gli3(R) accumulation, and shRNA-mediated disruption of Gli3 expression was sufficient to alter TP63 promoter usage and enhance clonigenicity of mammary stem cells. Finally, hedgehog signaling is enhanced during pregnancy, where it contributes to expansion of the mammary progenitor compartment. These studies support a model in which hedgehog activates elaboration and differentiation of mammary progenitors via differential TP63 promoter selection and forfeiture of self-renewing capacity.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsCell LineEpithelial CellsFemaleGene Expression RegulationHedgehog ProteinsHumansKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMammary Glands, AnimalMiceModels, BiologicalNerve Tissue ProteinsPhosphoproteinsPregnancyPromoter Regions, GeneticGli3 protein, mouseHedgehog Proteinsihh protein, mouseKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsNerve Tissue ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProtein IsoformsTrans-ActivatorsTrp63 protein, mouseZinc Finger Protein Gli3

Identifiers

PMID18292212
PMCPMC3778935
OpenAlexW2008524570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.