Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18291710›Full record

ReviewMutation research

New applications of the Comet assay: Comet-FISH and transcription-coupled DNA repair.

Graciela Spivak, Rachel A Cox, Philip C Hanawalt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. DNA comet Giemsa staining for conventional bright-field microscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Graciela SpivakDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA. gspivak@stanford.edu
Rachel A Cox
Philip C Hanawalt
Stanford University · US

Funding

Oxidative DNA damage processing; role in human pathology and agingR01ES018834 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HANAWALT, PHILIP COURTLAND · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Transcription Coupled DNA Repair and Human DiseaseR01CA091456 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HANAWALT, PHILIP COURTLAND · 2002 to 2006
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA91456NCI NIH HHS R01 CA091456NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES018834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription-coupled repair (TCR) is a pathway dedicated to the removal of damage from the template strands of actively transcribed genes. Although the detailed mechanism of TCR is not yet understood, it is believed to be triggered when a translocating RNA polymerase is arrested at a lesion or unusual structure in the DNA. Conventional assays for TCR require high doses of DNA damage for the statistical analysis of repair in the individual strands of DNA sequences ranging in size from a few hundred bases to 30kb. The single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay allows detection of single- or double-strand breaks at a 10-100-fold higher level of resolution. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) combined with the Comet assay (Comet-FISH) affords a heightened level of sensitivity for the assessment of repair in defined DNA sequences of cells treated with physiologically relevant doses of genotoxins. This approach also reveals localized susceptibility to chromosomal breakage in cells from individuals with hypersensitivity to radiation or chemotherapy. Several groups have reported preferential repair in transcriptionally active genes or chromosomal domains using Comet-FISH. The prevailing interpretation of the behavior of DNA in the Comet assay assumes that the DNA is arranged in loops and matrix-attachment sites; that supercoiled, undamaged loops are contained within the nuclear matrix and appear in Comet "heads", and that Comet "tails" consist of relaxed DNA loops containing one or more breaks. According to this model, localization of FISH probes in Comet heads signifies that loops containing the targeted sequences are free of damage. This implies that preferential repair as detected by Comet-FISH might encompass large chromosomal domains containing both transcribed and non-transcribed sequences. We review the existing evidence and discuss the implications in relation to current models for the molecular mechanism of TCR.

Indexed as

AnimalsComet AssayDNA DamageDNA RepairGenetic TherapyHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMutagensPyrimidine DimersTranscription, GeneticXeroderma PigmentosumMutagensPyrimidine Dimers

Identifiers

PMID18291710
PMCPMC2667151
OpenAlexW2020361869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.