Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18289745›Full record

ArticleVaccine2008

Priming with rAAV encoding RBD of SARS-CoV S protein and boosting with RBD-specific peptides for T cell epitopes elevated humoral and cellular immune responses against SARS-CoV infection.

Lanying Du, Guangyu Zhao, Yongping Lin, Chris Chan, Yuxian He, Shibo Jiang, Changyou Wu, Dong-Yan Jin, Kwok-Yung Yuen, Yusen Zhou and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Overview of SARS-CoV-2 genome-encoded proteins.Science China. Life sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lanying DuDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Guangyu Zhao
Yongping Lin
Chris Chan
Yuxian He
Shibo Jiang
Changyou Wu
Dong-Yan Jin
Kwok-Yung Yuen
Yusen Zhou
Bo-Jian Zheng
University of Hong Kong · HKNew York Blood Center · USInstitute of Microbiology · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

SARS-CoV S Protein Receptor-binding Domain-based VaccinesR01AI068002 · NIAID · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI JIANG, SHIBO · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068002NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI 68002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is crucial in the prevention of SARS reemergence. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV spike (S) protein is an important target in developing safe and effective SARS vaccines. Our previous study has demonstrated that vaccination with adeno-associated virus encoding RBD (RBD-rAAV) induces high titer of neutralizing antibodies. In this study, we further assessed the immune responses and protective effect of the immunization with RBD-rAAV prime/RBD-specific T cell peptide boost. Compared with the RBD-rAAV prime/boost vaccination, RBD-rAAV prime/RBD-peptide (RBD-Pep) boost induced similar levels of Th1 and neutralizing antibody responses that protected the vaccinated mice from subsequent SARS-CoV challenge, but stronger Th2 and CTL responses. No significant immune responses and protective effects were detected in mice vaccinated with RBD-Pep or blank AAV alone. Since T cell epitopes are highly conserved and boosting with peptides may induce the production of effector memory T cells, which may be effective against viruses with mutations in the neutralizing epitopes, our results suggest that the vaccination protocol used may be ideal for providing effective, broad and long-term protection against SARS-CoV infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibody FormationCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCoronavirus M ProteinsDependovirusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpitopesFemaleFlow CytometryImmunity, CellularImmunization ScheduleImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred BALB CCoronavirus M ProteinsEpitopesImmunoglobulin GM protein, SARS-CoVReceptors, VirusVaccines, SyntheticViral Matrix ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID18289745
PMCPMC2600875
OpenAlexW2031774686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.