Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18288564›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematology2008

Treatment of invasive fungal infections in clinical practice: a multi-centre survey on customary dosing, treatment indications, efficacy and safety of voriconazole.

Jörg J Vehreschild, Angelika Böhme, Dietmar Reichert, Michael G Kiehl, Dorothee Arenz, Karen Pankraz, Matthias Kochanek, Andrew J Ullmann, Oliver A Cornely

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tolerability profile of the current antifungal armoury.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jörg J VehreschildKlinikum der Universität zu Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Studienzentrum Infektiologie II, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Angelika BöhmeJohann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Medizinische Klinik II, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Dietmar ReichertStädtische Kliniken Oldenburg, Dr. Eden-Straße 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
Michael G KiehlKlinikum Frankfurt/Oder, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Müllroser Chaussee 7, 15236, Frankfurt an der Oder, Germany.
Dorothee ArenzKlinikum der Universität zu Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Studienzentrum Infektiologie II, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Karen PankrazKlinikum der Universität zu Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Studienzentrum Infektiologie II, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Matthias KochanekKlinikum der Universität zu Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Studienzentrum Infektiologie II, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Andrew J UllmannJohannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Medizinische Klinik III, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55101, Mainz, Germany.
Oliver A CornelyKlinikum der Universität zu Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Studienzentrum Infektiologie II, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Germany. oliver.cornely@uni-koeln.de.
University of Cologne · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinikum Frankfurt Höchst · DEKlinikum Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections are frequent and often deadly complications in patients with malignant hematological diseases. Voriconazole is a third generation triazole antifungal with broad activity against most clinically relevant fungal pathogens. Clinical practice often deviates from insights gained from controlled randomized trials. We conducted a multi-centre survey to evaluate efficacy, safety, treatment indications and dosing of voriconazole outside clinical trials. Patients receiving voriconazole were documented via electronic data capturing. An analysis was conducted after submission of 100 episodes from September 2004 to November 2005. Voriconazole was administered for suspected or proven invasive fungal infection (IFI) (57%), as empirical treatment in patients with fever of unknown origin (21%) and secondary (19%) as well as primary (3%) prophylaxis of IFI. Investigators' assessment of fungal infection often diverted from EORTC/MSG 2002 criteria. A favorable response was reported in 61.4% for suspected or proven IFI and 52.4% for empirical treatment. Mortality was 15%, 26.7% of which was attributable to IFI. Breakthrough fungal infections occurred in four (21.1%) patients with voriconazole as secondary prophylaxis. Toxicity and adverse events comprised elevated liver enzymes and visual disturbances. Although indications frequently deviated from clinical evidence and legal approval, voriconazole showed efficacy and safety, comparable to major controlled clinical trials. Data from this survey demonstrate the difficulty of putting drugs to their approved use in IFI.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMycosesPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID18288564
PMCPMC2276240
OpenAlexW1979076513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.