Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18288327›Full record

Trial reportEnvironmental health perspectives2008

Dental amalgam exposure and urinary mercury levels in children: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.

Nancy Nairi Maserejian, Felicia L Trachtenberg, Susan F Assmann, Lars Barregard

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Environmental health perspectives, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Immune function effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2008
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mercury in Children: Current State on Exposure through Human Biomonitoring Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nancy Nairi MaserejianNew England Research Institutes, 9 Galen Street, Watertown, MA 02472, USA. nmaserejian@neriscience.com
Felicia L Trachtenberg
Susan F Assmann
Lars Barregard
New England Research Institutes · USSahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

HEALTH EFFECTS OF DENTAL AMALGAMS IN CHILDRENU01DE011886 · NIDCR · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MCKINLAY, SONJA M · 1996 to 2005
$8.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE011886NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE 11886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary mercury (U-Hg) excretion is a commonly used biomarker for mercury exposure from dental amalgam restorations.

objectivesOur goal was to determine the most efficient measure of dental amalgam exposure for use in analyses concerning U-Hg in children.

methodsWe analyzed time-sensitive longitudinal amalgam exposure data in children randomized to amalgam restorations (n = 267) during the 5-year New England Children's Amalgam Trial. We calculated 8 measures of amalgam, evaluating current versus cumulative exposure, teeth versus surfaces, and total versus posterior occlusal amalgams. Urine samples collected during follow-up years 3-5 were analyzed for mercury excretion. Multivariate models for current and cumulative U-Hg excretion estimated associations between exposures and U-Hg.

resultsAt the end of follow-up, the average (+/- SD) cumulative exposure was 10.3 +/- 6.1 surfaces and 5.7 +/- 2.9 teeth ever filled with amalgam, corresponding to 30 +/- 21 surface-years. Amalgam measures and U-Hg were moderately correlated. Of amalgam exposure measures, the current total of amalgam surfaces was the most robust predictor of current U-Hg, whereas posterior occlusal surface-years was best for cumulative U-Hg. In multivariate models, each additional amalgam surface present was associated with a 9% increase in current U-Hg, and each additional posterior occlusal surface-year was associated with a 3% increase in cumulative U-Hg excretion (p < 0.001).

conclusionsOne single measure of amalgam exposure is insufficient. Studies of cumulative effects of mercury from amalgam exposure in children are likely to have improved validity and precision if time-sensitive amalgam exposure measures are used. In contrast, simple counts of current amalgam fillings are adequate to capture amalgam-related current U-Hg.

Indexed as

Dental AmalgamChildFemaleHumansMaleMercuryDental AmalgamMercurychildrencreatinine/urinedental amalgamenvironmental exposuremercurymercury/urine

Identifiers

PMID18288327
PMCPMC2235235
OpenAlexW2061140737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.