Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18288249›Full record

ReviewNeural plasticity2007

The importance of cognitive phenotypes in experimental modeling of animal anxiety and depression.

Allan V Kalueff, Dennis L Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural plasticity, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Alloparenting by Helpers in Striped Hyena (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Allan V KalueffLaboratory of Clinical Science, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1264, USA. kalueva@mail.nih.gov
Dennis L Murphy
National Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Genetic Mouse Models for the Study of Serotonin Function and BehaviorZIAMH000332 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MURPHY, DENNIS L · 2009 to 2014
$4.9M
Genetic Animal Models for the Study of Serotonin Function and BehaviorZ01MH000332 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MURPHY, DENNIS L · 1985 to 2008
$2.7M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive dysfunctions are commonly seen in many stress-related disorders, including anxiety and depression-the world's most common neuropsychiatric illnesses. Various genetic, pharmacological, and behavioral animal models have long been used to establish animal anxiety-like and depression-like phenotypes, as well as to assess their memory, learning, and other cognitive functions. Mounting clinical and animal evidences strongly supports the notion that disturbed cognitions represent an important pathogenetic factor in anxiety and depression, and may also play a role in integrating the two disorders within a common stress-precipitated developmental pathway. This paper evaluates why and how the assessment of cognitive and emotional domains may improve our understanding of animal behaviors via different high-throughput tests and enable a better translation of animal phenotypes into human brain disorders.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnxiety DisordersBehavior, AnimalCognitionCognition DisordersDepressive DisorderNeuropsychological TestsPhenotypeStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID18288249
PMCPMC2233771
OpenAlexW1984429189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.