Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18288090›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2008

Pharmacogenetic analysis of genes implicated in rodent models of antidepressant response: association of TREK1 and treatment resistance in the STAR(*)D study.

Roy H Perlis, Priya Moorjani, Jesen Fagerness, Shaun Purcell, Madhukar H Trivedi, Maurizio Fava, A John Rush, Jordan W Smoller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Genetics and Neurobiology of Treatment-Resistant Depression-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. KScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. The Genetics of Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Critical Review and Future Perspectives.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review of Cohort Studies for Mood Disorders.Psychiatry investigation · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roy H PerlisDepression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. rperlis@partners.org
Priya Moorjani
Jesen Fagerness
Shaun Purcell
Madhukar H Trivedi
Maurizio Fava
A John Rush
Jordan W Smoller
Massachusetts General Hospital · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USCenter for Human Genetics · US

Funding

Pramipexole in Treatment-Resistant DepressionK23MH067060 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H · 2003 to 2007
$845k
TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION-278990003N01MH090003 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · 1999 to 2003
–
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH067060NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH090003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent rodent models of antidepressant response implicate a novel set of genes in mechanisms of antidepressant action. The authors examined variants in four such genes (KCNK2 (TREK1), SLC18A2 (VMAT2), S100A10, and HDAC5) for association with remission in a large effectiveness trial of antidepressant treatments. Subjects were drawn from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR(*)D) study, a multicenter, prospective, effectiveness trial in major depressive disorder (MDD). Outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD were initially treated with citalopram for up to 14 weeks; those who did not remit with citalopram were sequentially randomized to a series of next-step treatments, each for up to 12 weeks. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in four genes were examined for association with remission, defined as a clinician-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C(16)) score < or =5. Of 1554 participants for whom DNA was available, 565 (36%) reached remission with citalopram treatment. No association with any of the four genes was identified. However, among the 751 who entered next-step treatment, variants in KCNK2 were associated with treatment response (Bonferroni-corrected, gene-based empirical p<0.001). In follow-up analyses, KCNK2 was also associated with effects of similar magnitude for third-step treatment among those with unsatisfactory benefit to both citalopram and one next-step pharmacotherapy (n=225). These findings indicate that genetic variation in KCNK2 may identify individuals at risk for treatment resistance. More broadly, they indicate the utility of animal models in identifying genes for pharmacogenetic studies of antidepressant response.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAntidepressive AgentsBrain ChemistryCitalopramDepressive DisorderDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug ResistanceFemaleGene Expression RegulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMaleAntidepressive AgentsCitaloprampotassium channel protein TREK-1Potassium Channels, Tandem Pore DomainSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18288090
PMCPMC10034848
OpenAlexW2118168628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.