Gerbils can tune in.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Ontogeny of cellular organization and LGR5 expression in porcine cochlea revealed using tissue clearing and 3D imaging.iScience · 2022
   Article
2. Vibration Measurements of the Gerbil Eardrum Under Quasi-static Pressure Steps.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
   Article
3. How to Build a Fast and Highly Sensitive Sound Detector That Remains Robust to Temperature Shifts.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Biophysical properties of CaV1.3 calcium channels in gerbil inner hair cells.2008

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as