Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18286392›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews2008

Sources of stem cells for regenerative medicine.

Jennifer Hipp, Anthony Atala

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Amniotic fluid characteristics and its application in stem cell therapy: A review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Stem cells technology: a powerful tool behind new brain treatments.Drug delivery and translational research · 2018
    Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer HippWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Anthony Atala

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shortage of organ donors for regenerative medicine has stimulated research on stem cells as a potential resource for cell-based therapy. Stem cells have been used widely for regenerative medicine applications. The development of innovative methods to generate stem cells from different sources suggests that there may be new alternatives for cell-based therapies. Here, we provide an overview of human embryonic stem cells (hES) and the methods for obtaining these cells and other broadly multipotent or pluripotent cell types. These methods include somatic cell nuclear transfer, single cell embryo biopsy, arrested embryos, altered nuclear transfer, and reprogramming somatic cells. We also discuss the use of amniotic-fluid derived stem cells (AFS) for potential patient-specific therapies.

Indexed as

Stem CellsAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansNuclear Transfer TechniquesPluripotent Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineResearch Embryo CreationStem Cell TransplantationTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID18286392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.