ReviewPituitary2009
Radiotherapy of nonfunctioning and gonadotroph adenomas.
Review in Pituitary, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Non-invasive radiomics approach potentially predicts non-functioning pituitary adenomas subtypes before surgery.European radiology · 2018Article
- Retrospective observational analysis of non-irradiated non-functioning pituitary adenomas.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2015Observational
- Optimal management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas.Endocrine · 2015Review
- The role of radiation therapy in the management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transsphenoidal surgery is the treatment of choice for NFPA but is seldom curative. The management of patients in whom residual tumor is detected after surgery is not clear-cut. Radiation therapy is effective in controlling tumor mass in the majority of patients, but is associated with long term complications that call for restriction of its use to patients at high risk for tumor growth. New radiation techniques may prove to be safer while retaining the effectiveness of conventional radiotherapy, however longer follow-up is necessary to confirm this assumption. For now, it appears to be safe to withhold radiation and carefully follow patients with small tumor remnants, whereas large remnants from invasive tumors should be considered for radiotherapy. Nevertheless, there are no prospective controlled studies that support this empirical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18286373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.