ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2008
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Not On Tobacco program for adolescent smoking cessation.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01242657 (Quit and Fit), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Quit and Fit: Exploring the Effects of Physical Activity on Teen Smoking Cessation
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic Evaluations of Mental Health Programs for Children and Adolescents in the United States: A Systematic Review.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2021Pooled it
- Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions for high risk young people.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- Model-based economic evaluations in smoking cessation and their transferability to new contexts: a systematic review.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of smoking-cessation therapies: a critical and systematic review of simulation models.PharmacoEconomics · 2012Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of pharmaco- and behavioral therapies for smoking cessation: a critical and systematic review of empirical research.Annual review of public health · 2012Pooled it
- Reducing smoking in adolescents: cost-effectiveness results from the cluster randomized ASSIST (A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial).Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012Trial
- A randomized trial of nicotine nasal spray in adolescent smokers.Pediatrics · 2008Trial
- The cost-effectiveness of school-based interventions for chronic diseases: a systematic review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Review
- Multidisciplinary Approach to Smoking Cessation in Late Adolescence: A Pilot Study.Global pediatric health · 2020Article
- Research priorities for economic analyses of prevention: current issues and future directions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2014Article
- Developing a Dissemination Model to Improve Intervention Reach among West Virginia Youth Smokers.Frontiers in public health · 2014Article
- The cost-effectiveness of a school-based smoking prevention program in India.Health promotion international · 2013Article
- Building Efficient Crime Prevention Strategies: Considering the Economics of Investing in Human Development.Criminology & public policy · 2013Article
- Beyond quitting: predictors of teen smoking cessation, reduction and acceleration following a school-based intervention.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2009Article
- A profile of teen smokers who volunteered to participate in school-based smoking intervention.Tobacco induced diseases · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Public health researchers and practitioners emphasize the need for effective, adoptable, and available youth smoking cessation interventions. Scarce resources demand that such interventions also be cost effective. This study describes a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the American Lung Association's Not On Tobacco (N-O-T) national and international teen smoking cessation program. N-O-T has been rigorously evaluated as an effective and adoptable program, and was recently found to be the most frequently-used teen smoking cessation program in the nation. N-O-T studies show intent-to-treat quit rates between 15% and 19%, among the highest reported in the literature. The current CEA resulted from a 2-year state-wide demonstration study in Florida, comparing the effectiveness of N-O-T with a 20-min brief intervention (BI). The CEA utilized a Markov transition model of decision analysis to explain stage progression of smoking cessation among participants from the age of 17 to 25 years. The Markov simulation predicted that out of a cohort of 100 N-O-T students, 10 will quit smoking and remain smoke-free at the age of 25 years and 14 will reduce smoking, resulting in 102.22 life years saved and a total of 20.11 years discounted life years (DLY) saved. Among BI youth, six will quit smoking and nine will reduce, indicating 64.31 life years saved and a total 12.65 DLY saved. The incremental DLY saved is 7.46 years. Results indicate that N-O-T is a very cost-effective option school-based smoking cessation, as cost effective as school-based primary tobacco prevention, and potentially more cost effective than adult tobacco use cessation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.