Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18286253›Full record

ReviewHNO2008

[Tissue engineering of respiratory epithelium. Regenerative medicine for reconstructive surgery of the upper airways].

M Bücheler, U von Foerster, A Haisch, F Bootz, S Lang, N Rotter

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M BüchelerKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde/HNO-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Deutschland. markus.buecheler@ukb.uni-bonn.de
U von Foerster
A Haisch
F Bootz
S Lang
N Rotter
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstruction of long tracheal defects remains an unsolved surgical problem. Tissue engineering of respiratory epithelium is therefore of utmost surgical and scientific interest. Successful cultivation and reproduction of respiratory epithelium in vitro is crucial to seed scaffolds of various biomaterials with functionally active respiratory mucosa. Most frequently, the suspension culture as well as the tissue or explant cultures are used. Collagenous matrices, synthetic and biodegradable polymers, serve as carriers in studies. It is essential for clinical practice that mechanically stable biomaterials be developed that are resorbable in the long term or that cartilaginous constructs produced in vitro be employed which are seeded with respiratory epithelium before implantation. Vascularization of a bioartificial matrix for tracheal substitution is also prerequisite for integration of the constructs produced in vitro into the recipient organism. Here, the state of the art of research, perspectives and limitations of tracheal tissue engineering are reviewed.

Indexed as

HumansOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresPlastic Surgery ProceduresRegenerative MedicineRespiratory MucosaTissue EngineeringTracheotomy

Identifiers

PMID18286253
OpenAlexW1575158908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.