Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2008
Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate.
Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- Risk of Valproic Acid-Related Tremor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Valproate (valproic acid or sodium valproate or a combination of the two) for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Low-dose sodium valproate versus low-dose propranolol in prophylaxis of common migraine headache: A randomized, prospective, parallel, open-label study.Indian journal of pharmacologyTrial
- Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cinnarizine Compared to Valproate in Pediatric Migraine: An Iranian Perspective.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2026Article
- A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache.PloS one · 2015Article
- Cinnarizine versus Topiramate in Prophylaxis of Migraines among Children and Adolescents: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2014Article
- Cinnarizine for the prophylaxis of migraine associated vertigo: a retrospective study.SpringerPlus · 2014Article
- Recent advances in delivery systems and therapeutics of cinnarizine: a poorly water soluble drug with absorption window in stomach.Journal of drug delivery · 2014Review
- Italian guidelines for primary headaches: 2012 revised version.The journal of headache and pain · 2012Article
- Are the current IHS guidelines for migraine drug trials being followed?The journal of headache and pain · 2010Review
- Role of antiepileptic drugs as preventive agents for migraine.CNS drugs · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedMansoureh, Togha [corrected to Togha, Mansoureh]
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This was a double-blind clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the cinnarizine (CIN) in patients with migraine who were refractory to propranolol and tricyclic antidepressants in comparison with sodium valproate (SV) to investigate whether CIN could be at least as effective as SV. A total of 125 patients were treated in a treatment period of 12 weeks. All patients had at least one intake of trial medication and 2-week post baseline efficacy observation which all were included in the ITT analysis. Of the 125 subjects treated, 46 discontinued prematurely: 25 from the CIN and 21 from the SV group. The main reasons for premature discontinuation were: lost to follow up (25/46, 63.2%), insufficient response (16/46, 20%), and adverse events (5/46, 12.8%). No statistically significant inter-group differences in the number of discontinuation was observed (p > 0.05). In both groups, number of attacks, intensity, and duration of attacks significantly decreased (p < 0.05). No statistically significant inter-group differences were observed regarding the mean number of attacks, duration, and intensity of migraine attacks for any of the time intervals analysed, except for the mean reduction of third and fourth visits intensity from baseline which were significantly different in two groups (p < 0.05), with the CIN group showing more reduction. Analysis of the number of responders showed that in the CIN group 61.2% subjects were responders, and 63.8% in the SV group. No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were found for any of the secondary parameters. Overall 26 subjects reported one or more adverse events during the study period: 13 subjects in each group. Five subjects discontinued prematurely due to adverse events; two in the CIN group with significant weight gain, and 3 in the SV group with significant weight gain and severe tremor. These results suggest that CIN is an effective and safe prophylactic agent even in severe migraine headache.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.