Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18285501›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2008

Protective heterologous immunity against fatal ehrlichiosis and lack of protection following homologous challenge.

Nagaraja R Thirumalapura, Heather L Stevenson, David H Walker, Nahed Ismail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Memory and Memory-Like NK Cell Responses to Microbial Pathogens.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nagaraja R ThirumalapuraDepartment of Pathology, Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0609, USA.
Heather L Stevenson
David H Walker
Nahed Ismail
John Sealy Hospital · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

PRODUCTION AND SHARING OF ENRLICHIAL RESEARCH REAGENTSR01AI031431 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI WALKER, DAVID H · 1991 to 2010
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI031431NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI3143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The roles of antibodies and memory T cells in protection against virulent Ehrlichia have not been completely investigated. In this study, we addressed these issues by using murine models of mild and fatal ehrlichiosis caused by related monocytotropic Ehrlichia strains. Mice were primed with either Ehrlichia muris or closely related virulent ehrlichiae transmitted by Ixodes ovatus (IOE) ticks given intraperitoneally or intradermally. All groups were reinfected intraperitoneally, 30 days later, with a lethal high dose of IOE. Priming with E. muris, but not IOE, induced strong CD4+ and CD8+ memory type 1 T-cell responses, Ehrlichia-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, and persistent infection. Compared to IOE-primed mice, subsequent lethal IOE challenge of E. muris-primed mice, resulted in (i) 100% protection against lethal infection, (ii) strong Ehrlichia-specific secondary gamma interferon (IFN-gamma)-producing effector/effector memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, (iii) enhanced secondary anti-ehrlichial antibody response, (iv) accelerated bacterial clearance, and (v) the formation of granulomas in the liver and lung. E. muris-primed mice challenged with IOE had lower levels of serum interleukin-1alpha (IL-1alpha), IL-6, and IL-10 compared to unprimed mice challenged with IOE. Interestingly, the fatal secondary response in IOE-primed mice correlated with (i) decline in the Ehrlichia-specific CD4+ and CD8+ type 1 responses, (ii) marked hepatic apoptosis and necrosis, and (iii) substantial bacterial clearance, suggesting that fatal secondary response is due to immune-mediated tissue damage. In conclusion, protection against fatal ehrlichial infection correlates with strong expansion of IFN-gamma-producing CD4+ and CD8+ effector memory type 1 T cells, which appear to be maintained in the presence of IgG antibodies and persistent infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialApoptosisCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEhrlichiaEhrlichiosisFemaleGranulomaInterferon-gammaInterleukinsLiverLungMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNecrosisAntibodies, BacterialInterferon-gammaInterleukins

Identifiers

PMID18285501
PMCPMC2346691
OpenAlexW2145554474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.