Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18284700›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2008

Understanding the work of general practitioners: a social science perspective on the context of medical decision making in primary care.

Robert Geneau, Pascale Lehoux, Raynald Pineault, Paul Lamarche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Doctors' behaviours with antibiotic prescribing.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Influence of patient payment on antibiotic prescribing in Irish general practice: a cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert GeneauDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. rgeneau@scohs.on.ca
Pascale Lehoux
Raynald Pineault
Paul Lamarche

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe work of general practitioners (GPs) is increasingly being looked at from the perspective of the strategies and factors shaping it. This reflects the importance given to primary care services in health care system reform. However, the literature provides little insight into the medical decision-making processes in general practice. Our main objective was to better understand how organizational and environmental factors influence the work of GPs.

methodsWe interviewed 28 GPs working in contrasting organizational settings and environments. The data analysis involved using structuration theory to enrich the interpretation of empirical material.

resultsWe identified four main factors that influence the practice of GPs: mode of remuneration, peer-to-peer interactions, patients' demands and the availability of other medical resources in the environment. These four conditions of action - what we call primary effects - can directly influence the performance of medical acts and time management, as well as the degree of specialization of GPs. Decisions related to each of those aspects can have a variety of both intentional and non-intentional consequences - what we call secondary effects - that are then likely to become conditions for subsequent action.

conclusionThis qualitative study helps shed light on the complex causal loops of interrelated factors that shape the work of GPs.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFamily PracticeAccess to InformationData CollectionFee-for-Service PlansFees and ChargesHealth Services ResearchHumansNational Health ProgramsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuebec

Identifiers

PMID18284700
PMCPMC2263046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.