ArticleBMC genomics2008
Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system.
Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypergravity hinders proper dendritic patterning of a sensory neuron in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Detecting gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics · 2025Review
- Small RNA-mediated genetic switches coordinate ALG-3/4 small RNA pathway function.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Molecular and circuit mechanisms underlying avoidance of rapid cooling stimuli in C. elegans.Nature communications · 2024Article
- 3'sialyllactose and 6'sialyllactose enhance performance in endurance-type exercise through metabolic adaptation.Food science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Article
- Reverse complementary matches simultaneously promote both back-splicing and exon-skipping.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- RNAi pathways repress reprogramming of C. elegans germ cells during heat stress.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Mechanisms that regulate morphogenesis of a highly branched neuron in C. elegans.Developmental biology · 2019Review
- A conserved neuronal DAF-16/FoxO plays an important role in conveying pheromone signals to elicit repulsion behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Tissue enrichment analysis for C. elegans genomics.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Homeodomain-Interacting Protein Kinase (HPK-1) regulates stress responses and ageing in C. elegans.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- CSR-1 and P granules suppress sperm-specific transcription in the C. elegans germline.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2015Article
- Conserved RNA-binding proteins required for dendrite morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans sensory neurons.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Article
- Sensory neuron fates are distinguished by a transcriptional switch that regulates dendrite branch stabilization.Neuron · 2013Article
- Optogenetic analysis of a nociceptor neuron and network reveals ion channels acting downstream of primary sensors.Current biology : CB · 2012Article
- Netrin (UNC-6) mediates dendritic self-avoidance.Nature neuroscience · 2012Article
- Evaluation of sex-specific gene expression in archived dried blood spots (DBS).International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA microarrays provide a powerful method for global analysis of gene expression. The application of this technology to specific cell types and tissues, however, is typically limited by small amounts of available mRNA, thereby necessitating amplification. Here we compare microarray results obtained with two different methods of RNA amplification to profile gene expression in the C. elegans larval nervous system.
resultsWe used the mRNA-tagging strategy to isolate transcripts specifically from C. elegans larval neurons. The WT-Ovation Pico System (WT-Pico) was used to amplify 2 ng of pan-neural RNA to produce labeled cDNA for microarray analysis. These WT-Pico-derived data were compared to microarray results obtained with a labeled aRNA target generated by two rounds of In Vitro Transcription (IVT) of 25 ng of pan-neural RNA. WT-Pico results in a higher fraction of present calls than IVT, a finding consistent with the proposal that DNA-DNA hybridization results in lower mismatch signals than the RNA-DNA heteroduplexes produced by IVT amplification. Microarray data sets from these samples were compared to a reference profile of all larval cells to identify transcripts with elevated expression in neurons. These results were validated by the high proportion of known neuron-expressed genes detected in these profiles and by promoter-GFP constructs for previously uncharacterized genes in these data sets. Together, the IVT and WT-Pico methods identified 2,173 unique neuron-enriched transcripts. Only about half of these transcripts (1,044), however, are detected as enriched by both IVT and WT-Pico amplification.
conclusionWe show that two different methods of RNA amplification, IVT and WT-Pico, produce valid microarray profiles of gene expression in the C. elegans larval nervous system with a low rate of false positives. However, our results also show that each method of RNA amplification detects a unique subset of bona fide neural-enriched transcripts and thus a wider array of authentic neural genes are identified by the combination of these data sets than by the microarray profiles obtained with either method of RNA amplification alone. With its relative ease of implementation and greater sensitivity, WT-Pico is the preferred method of amplification for cases in which sample RNA is limiting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.