ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
MScanner: a classifier for retrieving Medline citations.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- BioReader: a text mining tool for performing classification of biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- Integrating unified medical language system and association mining techniques into relevance feedback for biomedical literature search.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Mining biomedical images towards valuable information retrieval in biomedical and life sciences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Review
- Finding Related Publications: Extending the Set of Terms Used to Assess Article Similarity.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016Article
- MSL: Facilitating automatic and physical analysis of published scientific literature in PDF format.F1000Research · 2015Article
- Text mining for neuroanatomy using WhiteText with an updated corpus and a new web application.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2015Article
- Article
- Accessing biomedical literature in the current information landscape.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014Review
- MeSH indexing based on automatically generated summaries.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Using cited references to improve the retrieval of related biomedical documents.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Comparison and combination of several MeSH indexing approaches.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2013Article
- Text Categorization of Heart, Lung, and Blood Studies in the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) Utilizing n-grams and Metadata Features.Biomedical informatics insights · 2013Article
- Application and evaluation of automated methods to extract neuroanatomical connectivity statements from free text.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Caipirini: using gene sets to rank literature.BioData mining · 2012Article
- Cost sensitive hierarchical document classification to triage PubMed abstracts for manual curation.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- The Protein-Protein Interaction tasks of BioCreative III: classification/ranking of articles and linking bio-ontology concepts to full text.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches.PloS one · 2011Article
- A bottom-up approach to MEDLINE indexing recommendations.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2011Article
- PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKeyword searching through PubMed and other systems is the standard means of retrieving information from Medline. However, ad-hoc retrieval systems do not meet all of the needs of databases that curate information from literature, or of text miners developing a corpus on a topic that has many terms indicative of relevance. Several databases have developed supervised learning methods that operate on a filtered subset of Medline, to classify Medline records so that fewer articles have to be manually reviewed for relevance. A few studies have considered generalisation of Medline classification to operate on the entire Medline database in a non-domain-specific manner, but existing applications lack speed, available implementations, or a means to measure performance in new domains.
resultsMScanner is an implementation of a Bayesian classifier that provides a simple web interface for submitting a corpus of relevant training examples in the form of PubMed IDs and returning results ranked by decreasing probability of relevance. For maximum speed it uses the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and journal of publication as a concise document representation, and takes roughly 90 seconds to return results against the 16 million records in Medline. The web interface provides interactive exploration of the results, and cross validated performance evaluation on the relevant input against a random subset of Medline. We describe the classifier implementation, cross validate it on three domain-specific topics, and compare its performance to that of an expert PubMed query for a complex topic. In cross validation on the three sample topics against 100,000 random articles, the classifier achieved excellent separation of relevant and irrelevant article score distributions, ROC areas between 0.97 and 0.99, and averaged precision between 0.69 and 0.92.
conclusionMScanner is an effective non-domain-specific classifier that operates on the entire Medline database, and is suited to retrieving topics for which many features may indicate relevance. Its web interface simplifies the task of classifying Medline citations, compared to building a pre-filter and classifier specific to the topic. The data sets and open source code used to obtain the results in this paper are available on-line and as supplementary material, and the web interface may be accessed at http://mscanner.stanford.edu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.