Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18283540›Full record

ArticleGenetica2008

Comparative gene mapping in cattle, Indian muntjac, and Chinese muntjac by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Andrea E Murmann, Antoaneta Mincheva, Markus O Scheuermann, Mathieu Gautier, Fentang Yang, Johannes Buitkamp, Pamela L Strissel, Reiner Strick, Janet D Rowley, Peter Lichter

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrea E MurmannDepartment of Medicine, Section Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. amurmann@uchicago.edu
Antoaneta Mincheva
Markus O Scheuermann
Mathieu Gautier
Fentang Yang
Johannes Buitkamp
Pamela L Strissel
Reiner Strick
Janet D Rowley
Peter Lichter
German Cancer Research Center · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of Chicago · USBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture · DEDépartement Génétique Animale · FRHeidelberg University · DEWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Indian muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis) has a karyotype of 2n = 6 in the female and 2n = 7 in the male. The karyotypic evolution of Indian muntjac via extensive tandem fusions and several centric fusions are well documented by molecular cytogenetic studies mainly utilizing chromosome paints. To achieve higher resolution mapping, a set of 42 different genomic clones coding for 37 genes and the nucleolar organizer region were used to examine homologies between the cattle (2n = 60), human (2n = 46), Indian muntjac (2n = 6/7) and Chinese muntjac (2n = 46) karyotypes. These genomic clones were mapped by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Localization of genes on all three pairs of M. m. vaginalis chromosomes and on the acrocentric chromosomes of M. reevesi allowed not only the analysis of the evolution of syntenic regions within the muntjac genus but also allowed a broader comparison of synteny with more distantly related species, such as cattle and human, to shed more light onto the evolving genome organization.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleChromosome MappingChromosomesChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialEvolution, MolecularFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMaleMuntjacs

Identifiers

PMID18283540
OpenAlexW2102710161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.