Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18283406›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2008

A combined clinical and MRI approach for outcome assessment of traumatic head injured comatose patients.

Nicolas Weiss, Damien Galanaud, Alexandre Carpentier, Sophie Tezenas de Montcel, Lionel Naccache, Pierre Coriat, Louis Puybasset

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The prognostic reliability of the Glasgow coma score in traumatic brain injuries: evaluation of MRI data.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mindsight: diagnostics in disorders of consciousness.Critical care research and practice · 2012
    Article
  13. Neuroimaging after coma.Neuroradiology · 2010
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas WeissUnité de NeuroAnesthésie-Réanimation, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'hôpital, Paris, France.
Damien Galanaud
Alexandre Carpentier
Sophie Tezenas de Montcel
Lionel Naccache
Pierre Coriat
Louis Puybasset
Sorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRImation (United States) · USPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with substantial consumption of health care resources. No clinical or paraclinical examination can reliably predict neurological evolution. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a combined clinical and MRI approach to predict outcome.

methodsThis prospective study took place between June 2001 and March 2005 in a Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit in Paris, France. Inclusion criteria were TBI patients still mechanically ventilated and without clinical signs of awareness after 2 weeks. Four clinical signs were assessed after cessation of sedation: grasping, yawning, chewing and paroxysmal sympathetic storm. FLAIR and T2* acquisitions on MRI were used in order to localize brain lesions. Statistically linked regions (clusters) were defined. Outcome was assessed at one year by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).

findings73 patients were included: 41 had poor outcome (GOS 1-3) and 32 had good outcome (GOS 4-5). Lesions in the clusters "right upper pons and right lower midbrain"," hypothalamus and basal forebrain","left parietal, left temporal, left occipital lobes and left insula" and the presence of grasping or chewing were associated with poor outcome in multivariate analysis. This combined clinical and MRI approach gives a much better prediction than MRI approach only (P < 0.009), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94 (95 % CI, 0.89-1.00).

interpretationThese data suggest that MRI associated with clinical assessment improves outcome prediction in severe TBI patients.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceBehaviorBrainBrain InjuriesComaFemaleFunctional LateralityGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID18283406
OpenAlexW2078501264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.