Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18282083›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2008

Modeling cancer progression via pathway dependencies.

Elena J Edelman, Justin Guinney, Jen-Tsan Chi, Phillip G Febbo, Sayan Mukherjee

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Data-Driven Methods for Advancing Precision Oncology.Current pharmacology reports · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pathway and network analysis in proteomics.Journal of theoretical biology · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular signaling network complexity is correlated with cancer patient survivability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena J EdelmanInstitute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Justin Guinney
Jen-Tsan Chi
Phillip G Febbo
Sayan Mukherjee
Duke University · US

Funding

Gene expression programs of lactic acidosis in human cancersR01CA125618 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHI, JEN-TSAN ASHLEY · 2007 to 2016
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125618NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125618-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a heterogeneous disease often requiring a complexity of alterations to drive a normal cell to a malignancy and ultimately to a metastatic state. Certain genetic perturbations have been implicated for initiation and progression. However, to a great extent, underlying mechanisms often remain elusive. These genetic perturbations are most likely reflected by the altered expression of sets of genes or pathways, rather than individual genes, thus creating a need for models of deregulation of pathways to help provide an understanding of the mechanisms of tumorigenesis. We introduce an integrative hierarchical analysis of tumor progression that discovers which a priori defined pathways are relevant either throughout or in particular steps of progression. Pathway interaction networks are inferred for these relevant pathways over the steps in progression. This is followed by the refinement of the relevant pathways to those genes most differentially expressed in particular disease stages. The final analysis infers a gene interaction network for these refined pathways. We apply this approach to model progression in prostate cancer and melanoma, resulting in a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Our analysis supports previous findings for the deregulation of several pathways involved in cell cycle control and proliferation in both cancer types. A novel finding of our analysis is a connection between ErbB4 and primary prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticModels, BiologicalSignal TransductionComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionHumansMaleMelanomaNeoplasm ProteinsProstatic NeoplasmsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18282083
PMCPMC2242820
OpenAlexW1978499455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.