Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18281435›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2008

Interactions of Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia lamblia, vaccinal poliovirus type 1, and bacteriophages phiX174 and MS2 with a drinking water biofilm and a wastewater biofilm.

Karim Helmi, Sylvain Skraber, Christophe Gantzer, Raphaël Willame, Lucien Hoffmann, Henry-Michel Cauchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Association ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biofilms and Coronavirus Reservoirs: a Perspective Review.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Biofilm Sampling for Detection ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Two Drinking Water Outbreaks Caused by Wastewater Intrusion Including Sapovirus in Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The use of wastewater in livestock production and its socioeconomic and welfare implications.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Human and animal enteric virus in groundwater from deep wells, and recreational and network water.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Microbial removals by a novel biofilter water treatment system.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2015
    Article
  18. Health risk assessment related to waterborne pathogens from the river to the tap.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karim HelmiCentre de Recherche Public-Gabriel Lippmann, Department of Environment and Agro-biotechnologies (EVA), 41 rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Sylvain Skraber
Christophe Gantzer
Raphaël Willame
Lucien Hoffmann
Henry-Michel Cauchie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms colonizing surfaces inside drinking water distribution networks may provide a habitat and shelter to pathogenic viruses and parasites. If released from biofilms, these pathogens may disseminate in the water distribution system and cause waterborne diseases. Our study aimed to investigate the interactions of protozoan parasites (Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia [oo]cysts) and viruses (vaccinal poliovirus type 1, phiX174, and MS2) with two contrasting biofilms. First, attachment, persistence, and detachment of the protozoan parasites and the viruses were assessed with a drinking water biofilm. This biofilm was allowed to develop inside a rotating annular reactor fed with tap water for 7 months prior to the inoculation. Our results show that viable parasites and infectious viruses attached to the drinking water biofilm within 1 h and persisted within the biofilm. Indeed, infectious viruses were detected in the drinking water biofilm up to 6 days after the inoculation, while viral genome and viable parasites were still detected at day 34, corresponding to the last day of the monitoring period. Since viral genome was detected much longer than infectious particles, our results raise the question of the significance of detecting viral genomes in biofilms. A transfer of viable parasites and viruses from the biofilm to the water phase was observed after the flow velocity was increased but also with a constant laminar flow rate. Similar results regarding parasite and virus attachment and detachment were obtained using a treated wastewater biofilm, suggesting that our observations might be extrapolated to a wide range of environmental biofilms and confirming that biofilms can be considered a potential secondary source of contamination.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyAnimalsBacteriophagesBiofilmsCryptosporidium parvumGiardia lambliaPoliovirusWaterWater SupplyWater

Identifiers

PMID18281435
PMCPMC2292593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.