ArticleCritical care (London, England)2008
Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 209 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of two behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain: A systematic review.Nursing open · 2021Pooled it
- Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca compartment (FI) block for hip surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Pooled it
- Effects of pain, sedation and delirium monitoring on clinical and economic outcome: A retrospective study.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Impact of audit and feedback with action implementation toolbox on improving ICU pain management: cluster-randomised controlled trial.BMJ quality & safety · 2019Trial
- Low-dose preoperative pregabalin improves postoperative pain management in septorhinoplasty surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019Trial
- [Daylight therapy in intensive care units: a review].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Article
- Severity and factors associated with pain in patients on mechanical ventilators in Amhara region, North-West Ethiopia: a multi-center prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Development of a Pain Measurement Device Using 3D Printing and Electronic Air Pressure Control.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Identification of Pain through Actigraphy-Recorded Patient Movement: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Pain Through a Novel Mobile Application: The Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Scale (VATAS).Cureus · 2024Article
- Pain Assessment in Cattle by Use of Numerical Rating and Visual Analogue Scales-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Comparison of the accuracy and the response time to behavioral pain scales (BPS and CPOT) during painful procedures in the intensive care unit.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Calibration trial of an innovative medical device (Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- PERSONALISED PAIN TREATMENT IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS - MONITORING OF NOCICEPTION.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Review
- Effects of immersive virtual reality on sensory overload in a random sample of critically ill patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Uncontrolled pain in critically ill patients and acute kidney injury: a hypothesis-generating cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2022Article
- Coeliac plexus radiosurgery for pain management in patients with advanced cancer : study protocol for a phase II clinical trial.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Comparison of femoral nerve block and acupuncture analgesia for acute preoperative pain in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Measurement of the nociceptive flexion reflex threshold in critically ill patients - a randomized observational pilot study.BMC anesthesiology · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common. However, pain assessment in critically ill patients often is complicated because these patients are unable to communicate effectively. Therefore, we designed a study (a) to determine the inter-rater reliability of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), (b) to compare pain scores of different observers and the patient, and (c) to compare NRS, BPS, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for measuring pain in patients in the ICU.
methodsWe performed a prospective observational study in 113 non-paralyzed critically ill patients. The attending nurses, two researchers, and the patient (when possible) obtained 371 independent observation series of NRS, BPS, and VAS. Data analyses were performed on the sample size of patients (n = 113).
resultsInter-rater reliability of the NRS and BPS proved to be adequate (kappa = 0.71 and 0.67, respectively). The level of agreement within one scale point between NRS rated by the patient and NRS scored by attending nurses was 73%. However, high patient scores (NRS > or = 4) were underestimated by nurses (patients 33% versus nurses 18%). In responsive patients, a high correlation between NRS and VAS was found (rs = 0.84, P < 0.001). In ventilated patients, a moderate positive correlation was found between the NRS and the BPS (rs = 0.55, P < 0.001). However, whereas 6% of the observations were NRS of greater than or equal to 4, BPS scores were all very low (median 3.0, range 3.0 to 5.0).
conclusionThe different scales show a high reliability, but observer-based evaluation often underestimates the pain, particularly in the case of high NRS values (> or = 4) rated by the patient. Therefore, whenever this is possible, ICU patients should rate their pain. In unresponsive patients, primarily the attending nurse involved in daily care should score the patient's pain. In ventilated patients, the BPS should be used only in conjunction with the NRS nurse to measure pain levels in the absence of painful stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.