Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18278975›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2008

Vaccines for multiple sclerosis: progress to date.

Jorge Correale, Mauricio Farez, Wendy Gilmore

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge CorrealeDepartment of Neurology, Raúl Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, Buenos Aires, Argentina. jcorreale@fleni.org.ar
Mauricio Farez
Wendy Gilmore
Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia · ARSouthern California University for Professional Studies · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS, characterized pathologically by a perivascular infiltrate consisting predominantly of T cells and macrophages. Although its aetiology remains unknown, several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that autoimmune mechanisms play a major role in the development of the disease. Several widely used disease-modifying agents are approved for the treatment of MS. However, these agents are only partially effective and their ability to attenuate the more progressive phases of the disease is not clear at this time. Therefore, there is a need to develop improved treatment options for MS. This article reviews the role of several novel, selective vaccine strategies that are currently under investigation, including: (i) T-cell vaccination (TCV); (ii) T-cell receptor (TCR) peptide vaccination; (iii) DNA vaccination; and (iv) altered peptide ligand (APL) vaccination. The administration of attenuated autoreactive T cells induces regulatory networks to specifically suppress pathogenic T cells in MS, a strategy named TCV. The concept of TCV was based on the experience of vaccination against aetiological agents of infectious diseases in which individuals are purposely exposed to an attenuated microbial pathogen, which then instructs the immune system to recognize and neutralize it in its virulent form. In regard to TCV, attenuated, pathogenic T cells are similarly used to instruct the immune system to recognize and neutralize disease-inducing T cells. In experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model for MS, pathogenic T cells use a strikingly limited number of variable-region elements (V region) to form TCR specific for defined autoantigens. Thus, vaccination with peptides directed against these TCR structures may induce immunoregulatory mechanisms, thereby preventing EAE. However, unlike EAE, myelin-reactive T cells derived from MS patients utilize a broad range of different V regions, challenging the clinical utility of this approach. Subsequently, the demonstration that injection of plasmid DNA encoding a reporter gene into skeletal muscle results in expression of the encoded proteins, as well as in the induction of immune responses in animal models of autoimmunity, was explored as another strategy to re-establish self-tolerance. This approach has promise for the treatment of MS and, therefore, warrants further investigation. APLs are molecules in which the native encephalitogenic peptides are modified by substitution(s) of one or a few amino acids critical for contact with the TCR. Depending on the substitution(s) at the TCR contact residues of the cognate peptide, an APL can induce immune responses that can protect against or reverse EAE. However, the heterogeneity of the immune response in MS patients requires further study to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from APL therapy. Other potential approaches for vaccines in MS include vaccination against axonal growth inhibitors associated with myelin, use of dendritic cells pulsed with specific antigens, and active vaccination against proinflammatory cytokines. Overall, vaccines for MS represent promising approaches for the treatment of this devastating disease, as well as other autoimmune diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansModels, ImmunologicalMultiple SclerosisPeptide FragmentsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaT-LymphocytesVaccinationVaccinesVaccines, DNAPeptide FragmentsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaVaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID18278975
OpenAlexW2030184073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.