ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2008
Left ventricular aneurysm in the scope of gated perfusion SPECT: accuracy of detection and ejection fraction calculation.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impacts of severe perfusion defects, akinetic/dyskinetic segments, and viable myocardium on the accuracy of volumes and LVEF measured by gated ⁹⁹mTc-MIBI SPECT and gated ¹⁸F-FDG PET in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as the reference.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2014Article
- Simulation of left ventricular function during dyskinetic or akinetic aneurysm.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this trial was to investigate the capacity of gated perfusion SPECT (GPS) to detect left ventricular aneurysm (ANV) by comparing QGS and 4D-MSPECT (4DM) algorithms with radionuclide ventriculography (RVG). Secondarily, the comparison of GPS ejection fraction (EF) measurements with those of contrast left ventriculography (LVG) and RVG was aimed.
methodsTwenty-five patients with ANV confirmed by LVG were studied. The patients underwent RVG and rest Tc-99m-tetrofosmin GPS 1 week after LVG. A 9-segment model was used both in RVG and GPS evaluation. Aneurysm was defined by scoring the wall motion (WM) and phase analysis in RVG; perfusion, wall thickening and WM in GPS.
resultsThe detection rate of ANV was 96%, 84% and 52% for RVG, QGS and 4DM, respectively. The LVG mean EF (43.52% +/- 16.93%) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than those of RVG (29.40% +/- 10.90), QGS (30.04% +/- 13.25%) and 4DM (34.92% +/- 13.01%). Moderate to high EF correlation values were obtained between LVG and GPS (r = 0.71-0.79) and GPS-RVG (r = 0.69). There was no significant EF difference between the radionuclide methods except between 4DM-EF and RVG-EF (5.52%, P < 0.05). Wide Bland-Altman limits were observed between the radionuclide methods in EF comparisons (range: 30.5-38.5%).
conclusionGPS seems to have a role in the non-invasive investigation of ANV. QGS-GPS proved to be more reliable (84%) than 4DM-GPS (52%) in the ANV detection. The localization and the extent of the aneurysm itself as well as perfusion and function of adjacent segments may affect aneurysm diagnosis by means of GPS. RVG, QGS-GPS and 4DM-GPS seem not to be interchangeable for routine EF calculation in ANV patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.