ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2008
A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.
Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 147 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
147 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Adaptability, Scalability and Sustainability (ASaS) of complex health interventions: a systematic review of theories, models and frameworks.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Patient and Family Representation in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in 3 Medical and Surgical Journals: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Themes in Train-the-Trainer Nutrition Education Interventions Targeting Middle School Students: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Pooled it
- Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Pooled it
- Responding to the health needs of survivors of human trafficking: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Pooled it
- Living with, managing and minimising treatment burden in long term conditions: a systematic review of qualitative research.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2014Pooled it
- "Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method.BMC medical research methodology · 2013Pooled it
- Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes - methodological challenges and solutions.BMC medical research methodology · 2013Pooled it
- Uncovering treatment burden as a key concept for stroke care: a systematic review of qualitative research.PLoS medicine · 2013Pooled it
- A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents.BMC medical research methodology · 2011Pooled it
- The Effects of a Video Intervention on Posthospitalization Pulmonary Rehabilitation Uptake. A Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the development of a multidimensional conceptual framework capable of drawing out the implications for policy and practice of what is known about public involvement in research agenda setting.
backgroundPublic involvement in research is growing in western and developing countries. There is a need to learn from collective experience and a diverse literature of research, policy documents and reflective reports.
methodsSystematic searches of research literature, policy and lay networks identified reports of public involvement in research agenda setting. Framework analysis, previously described for primary research, was used to develop the framework, which was then applied to reports of public involvement in order to analyse and compare these.
findingsThe conceptual framework takes into account the people involved; the people initiating the involvement; the degree of public involvement; the forum for exchange; and methods used for decision making. It also considers context (in terms of the research focus and the historical, geographical or institutional setting), and theoretical basis.
conclusionsThe framework facilitates learning across diverse experiences, whether reported in policy documents, reflections or formal research, to generate a policy- and practice-relevant overview. A further advantage is that it identifies gaps in the literature which need to be filled in order to inform future research about public involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.