Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18274882›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2008

The validity of generic and condition-specific preference-based instruments: the ability to discriminate asthma control status.

Helen M McTaggart-Cowan, Carlo A Marra, Yaling Yang, John E Brazier, Jacek A Kopec, J Mark FitzGerald, Aslam H Anis, Larry D Lynd

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The added effect of comorbidity on health-related quality of life in patients with asthma.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and a bespoke TTO in acute asthmatics.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A comparison of the responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and the QOLIE-31P and mapping of QOLIE-31P to EQ-5D-5L in epilepsy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Measurement of utility in asthma: evidence indicating that generic instruments may miss clinically important changes.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  18. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in Pompe disease.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helen M McTaggart-CowanCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 7th Floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 1L8.
Carlo A Marra
Yaling Yang
John E Brazier
Jacek A Kopec
J Mark FitzGerald
Aslam H Anis
Larry D Lynd

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U145080960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA goal of asthma management is to improve the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQL). However, it is unclear whether HRQL instruments can discriminate across asthma control measures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of generic and condition-specific preference-based instruments, in terms of their ability to distinguish asthma control.

methodsAsthma patients (n = 157) completed three generic preference-based instruments: the Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI-3), the EuroQol (EQ-5D), and the Short Form 6D (SF-6D) and two condition-specific questionnaires: the standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)) and the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). The AQLQ(S) scores were converted into the condition-specific preference-based scores: the Asthma Quality of Life Utility Index (AQL-5D).

resultsThe preference-based instruments were generally able to discriminate across control measures, such as ACQ scores and magnitude of asthma medication, but were not able to discriminate for self-reported control and severity levels. These instruments also correlated with most control measures (r = 0.32-0.37). Significant relationships between AQL-5D scores and all control variables were observed.

conclusionsOverall, the AQL-5D discriminated across all levels of asthma control. The HUI-3, the EQ-5D, and the SF-6D differentiated between the highest and lowest levels of control but could not discriminate between the moderate levels.

Indexed as

AdultAsthmaBritish ColumbiaFemaleHealth StatusHealth Status IndicatorsHealth SurveysHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeRespiratory Function TestsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.