Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18274715›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2008

[Problems in the treatment of upper rectal carcinoma].

T Junginger, P Hermanek

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T JungingerKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein- und Abdominalchirurgie, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany.
P Hermanek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the literature there is some disagreement about the treatment of upper rectal carcinoma (aboral margin 12-16 cm from the anocutaneous line), in particular about the necessary extent of mesorectal excision and the indications for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. The special pathologic features of upper rectal carcinomas (lymphatic spread, distal tumor spread beyond the gross margin) and present clinical experiences are discussed. From it result the following recommendations: partial mesorectal excision, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for cT4 tumors only; adjuvant radiochemotherapy in case of intraoperative tumor perforation or incision into/through tumor, incomplete partial mesorectal excision or tumor positive circumferential resection margin (CRM); adjuvant chemotherapy in case of histologically confirmed regional lymph node metastases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRectum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.