ArticleProtoplasma2008
DNA methylation and chromosomal rearrangements in reconstructed karyotypes of Hordeum vulgare L.
Article in Protoplasma, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Analysis of DNA Demethylase Gene Families in Foxtail Millet (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Systematic Analysis of the DNA Methylase and Demethylase Gene Families in Rapeseed (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Telomere and 45S rDNA sequences are structurally linked on the chromosomes in Chrysanthemum segetum L.Protoplasma · 2012Article
- DNA methylation pattern in a barley reconstructed karyotype with deleted ribosomal gene cluster of chromosome 6H.Protoplasma · 2010Article
- Methylated-rich regions and tandem repeat arrays along the chromosome complement of Colpodium versicolor (Stev.) Schmalh.Protoplasma · 2009Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One standard and two reconstructed barley karyotypes were used to study the influence of chromosomal rearrangements on the distribution pattern of DNA methylation detectable at the chromosome level. Data obtained were also compared with Giemsa N-bands and high gene density regions that had been previously described. The effect of chromosomal reconstruction in barley seems to be decidedly prominent in the repositioning of genomic DNA methylation along metaphase chromosomes. In comparison to the standard karyotype, the DNA methylation pattern was found to vary not only in the reconstructed chromosomes but also in the other chromosomes of the complements not subjected to structural alterations. Moreover, differences may occur between corresponding regions of homologues. Some specific chromosomal bands, including the nucleolus-organizing regions, showed a relative constancy in the methylation pattern, but this was not the case when the two satellites were combined by translocation in chromosome 6H(5H) of line T-30. Our results suggest that epigenetic changes like DNA methylation may play an important role in the overall genome reorganization following chromosome reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18274698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.