Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18273701›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2008

Gasping generation in developing Swiss-Webster mice in vitro and in vivo.

Fernando Peña, Roberto Meza-Andrade, Victor Páez-Zayas, María-Carmen González-Marín

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The cellular building blocks of breathing.Comprehensive Physiology · 2012
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. State-dependent interactions between excitatory neuromodulators in the neuronal control of breathing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Genesis of gasping is independent of levels of serotonin in the Pet-1 knockout mouse.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernando PeñaDepartamento de Farmacobiología, Cinvestav-Sede Sur, Calz. de los Tenorios 235, Col. Granjas Coapa, 14330, Mexico, DF, Mexico. jfpena@cinvestav.mx
Roberto Meza-Andrade
Victor Páez-Zayas
María-Carmen González-Marín
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During hypoxia the respiratory network produces gasping in vivo and in vitro. To understand the mechanisms involved in such response and to validate in vitro findings, correlative studies are necessary. During perinatal age gasping generation is robust and then declines during postnatal development, possibly due to changes in either the rhythm generator (the pre-Bötzinger complex, PBC) and/or its motor outputs. We tested this hypothesis by recording respiratory response to hypoxia in vivo and in vitro during postnatal development. We found that postnatal age influences: (1) The hypoxia-induced pattern change in the PBC bursts, (2) The coupling between the PBC and the XII nucleus during prolonged hypoxia and (3) The ability of mice to gasp and autoresuscitate from hypoxic conditions. We conclude that the inability of mice to gasp during late postnatal development might be determined by a progressive uncoupling between the respiratory rhythm generator and its motor outputs in hypoxia.

Indexed as

HypoxiaRespirationAnimalsAnimals, NewbornDyspneaElectrophysiologyFemaleHypoglossal NerveMicePlethysmography, Whole BodyPregnancyRespiratory Center

Identifiers

PMID18273701
OpenAlexW2074929983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.