Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18272565›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2008

Noninvasive molecular neuroimaging using reporter genes: part II, experimental, current, and future applications.

T F Massoud, A Singh, S S Gambhir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Noninvasive bioluminescence imaging of α-synuclein oligomerization in mouse brain using split firefly luciferase reporters.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Noninvasive cell-tracking methods.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2011
    Review
  14. Molecular Imaging of Stem Cell Transplantation in Myocardial Disease.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2010
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T F MassoudDepartment of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. tfm23@radiol.cam.ac.uk
A Singh
S S Gambhir

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryIn this second article, we review the various strategies and applications that make use of reporter genes for molecular imaging of the brain in living subjects. These approaches are emerging as valuable tools for monitoring gene expression in diverse applications in laboratory animals, including the study of gene-targeted and trafficking cells, gene therapies, transgenic animals, and more complex molecular interactions within the central nervous system. Further development of more sensitive and selective reporters, combined with improvements in detection technology, will consolidate the position of in vivo reporter gene imaging as a versatile technique for greater understanding of intracellular biologic processes and underlying molecular neuropathology and will potentially establish a future role in the clinical management of patients with neurologic diseases.

Indexed as

ForecastingGenes, ReporterAnimalsBrainDiagnostic ImagingGene Expression ProfilingHumansMolecular Probe TechniquesNeuroanatomyResearch

Identifiers

PMID18272565
PMCPMC8118871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.