Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18270866›Full record

Trial reportClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2008

Should rituximab be considered as the first-choice treatment for severe autoimmune rheumatic diseases?

Claudio Galarza, Diana Valencia, Gabriel J Tobón, Luis Zurita, Rubén D Mantilla, Ricardo Pineda-Tamayo, Adriana Rojas-Villarraga, Juan C Rueda, Juan-Manuel Anaya

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. A 16-year-old girl with sudden heart failure and nephrotic syndrome associated with Takayasu's arteritis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Emerging B-Cell Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Autoimmune Ecology.Frontiers in immunology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Whither autoimmunity: the lessons of anti-CCP and B cell depletion.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudio GalarzaUnidad de Enfermedades Reumáticas y Autoinmunes (UNERA), Hospital Monte Sinai, Cuenca, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Diana Valencia
Gabriel J Tobón
Luis Zurita
Rubén D Mantilla
Ricardo Pineda-Tamayo
Adriana Rojas-Villarraga
Juan C Rueda
Juan-Manuel Anaya
Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas · COUniversidad Pontificia Bolivariana · COUniversidad del Rosario · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the tolerance and efficacy of rituximab (RTX), a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 receptor present in B lymphocytes, in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD). For this purpose, patients treated with RTX and their respective clinical charts were comprehensively examined. Indications for treatment were a refractory character of the disease, inefficacy or intolerance of other immunosuppressors. Activity indexes (SLEDAI, DAS28, and specific clinical manifestations) were used to evaluate efficacy. Serious side effects were also recorded. Seventy-four patients were included. Forty-three patients had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 21 had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 8 had Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and 2 had Takayasu's arteritis (TA). RTX was well-tolerated in 66 (89%) patients. In 8 patients (SLE=3, SS=3, RA=2), serious side effects lead to discontinuation. The mean follow-up period was 12+/-7.8 (2-35) months. The efficacy of RTX was registered in 58/66 (87%) patients, of whom 36 (83%) had SLE, 18/21 (85%) had RA, 3/8 (37%) had SS, and 1 had TA. The mean time of efficacy was 6.3+/-5.1 weeks. A significant steroid-sparing effect was noticed in half of the patients. These results add further evidence for the use of RTX in AIRD. Based on its risk-benefit ratio, RTX might be used as the first-choice treatment for patients with severe AIRD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedArthritis, RheumatoidAutoimmune DiseasesFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedRheumatic DiseasesRituximabSjogren's SyndromeTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedImmunologic FactorsRituximab

Identifiers

PMID18270866
OpenAlexW2121447873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.