Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18270576›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Individual retinal progenitor cells display extensive heterogeneity of gene expression.

Jeffrey M Trimarchi, Michael B Stadler, Constance L Cepko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Deletion of histone demethylaseFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Neurog2 regulates Isl1 to modulate horizontal cell number.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  17. Cell Fate of Retinal Progenitor Cells: In Ovo UbC-StarTrack Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey M TrimarchiDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael B Stadler
Constance L Cepko
Friedrich Miescher Institute · CHHarvard University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF RETINAL DEVELOPMENTR01EY008064 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI CEPKO, CONSTANCE L · 1989 to 2013
$4.0M
Characterizing retinal progenitor cell heterogenityF32EY014495 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI TRIMARCHI, JEFFREY M · 2004 to 2005
$97k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS EY08064NEI NIH HHS F32 EY014495NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of complex tissues requires that mitotic progenitor cells integrate information from the environment. The highly varied outcomes of such integration processes undoubtedly depend at least in part upon variations among the gene expression programs of individual progenitor cells. To date, there has not been a comprehensive examination of these differences among progenitor cells of a particular tissue. Here, we used comprehensive gene expression profiling to define these differences among individual progenitor cells of the vertebrate retina. Retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) have been shown by lineage analysis to be multipotent throughout development and to produce distinct types of daughter cells in a temporal, conserved order. A total of 42 single RPCs were profiled on Affymetrix arrays. In situ hybridizations performed on both retinal sections and dissociated retinal cells were used to validate the results of the microarrays. An extensive amount of heterogeneity in gene expression among RPCs, even among cells isolated from the same developmental time point, was observed. While many classes of genes displayed heterogeneity of gene expression, the expression of transcription factors constituted a significant amount of the observed heterogeneity. In contrast to previous findings, individual RPCs were found to express multiple bHLH transcription factors, suggesting alternative models to those previously developed concerning how these factors may be coordinated. Additionally, the expression of cell cycle related transcripts showed differences among those associated with G2 and M, versus G1 and S phase, suggesting different levels of regulation for these genes. These data provide insights into the types of processes and genes that are fundamental to cell fate choices, proliferation decisions, and, for cells of the central nervous system, the underpinnings of the formation of complex circuitry.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationStem CellsAnimalsCell CycleCell LineageGene Expression ProfilingMiceMultipotent Stem CellsRetinaTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18270576
PMCPMC2220035
OpenAlexW2110741244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.