Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18269690›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2007

Recombinant human activated protein C: current insights into its mechanism of action.

Marcel Levi, Tom van der Poll

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The contact pathway and sepsis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Adjunct therapy for sepsis: how early?Current infectious disease reports · 2010
    Article
  11. The resuscitation package in sepsis.Current infectious disease reports · 2010
    Article
  12. Use of recombinant human activated protein C in nonmenstrual staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2010
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcel LeviDepartment of Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.m.levi@amc.uva.nl
Tom van der Poll
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairment of the protein C pathway plays a central role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Administration of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) may correct the dysregulated anticoagulant mechanism and prevent propagation of thrombin generation and formation of microvascular thrombosis. Furthermore, it may simultaneously modulate the inflammatory response. It is likely that the beneficial effect of rhAPC observed in experimental and clinical studies of severe sepsis results from a combination of mechanisms that modulate the entangled processes of coagulation and inflammation. This review presents an analysis of the various mechanisms of action of rhAPC in sepsis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Coagulation DisordersChronic DiseaseDisease Models, AnimalFibrinolytic AgentsHumansInflammation MediatorsProtein CRecombinant ProteinsSepsisThrombindrotrecogin alfa activatedFibrinolytic AgentsInflammation MediatorsProtein CRecombinant ProteinsThrombin

Identifiers

PMID18269690
PMCPMC2230607
OpenAlexW2167855944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.