ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Supervised Lowess normalization of comparative genome hybridization data--application to lactococcal strain comparisons.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of alternative mixture model methods to analyze bacterial CGH experiments with multi-genome arrays.BMC research notes · 2014Article
- Gene duplication in an African cichlid adaptive radiation.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Lytic infection of Lactococcus lactis by bacteriophages Tuc2009 and c2 triggers alternative transcriptional host responses.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Comparative transcriptomic analysis of streptococcus pseudopneumoniae with viridans group streptococci.BMC microbiology · 2012Article
- Genetic diversity of Streptococcus suis isolates as determined by comparative genome hybridization.BMC microbiology · 2011Article
- Assessment of the diversity of dairy Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis isolates by an integrated approach combining phenotypic, genomic, and transcriptomic analyses.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2011Article
- Mixed-culture transcriptome analysis reveals the molecular basis of mixed-culture growth in Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2010Article
- A critical assessment of cross-species detection of gene duplicates using comparative genomic hybridization.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Using comparative genomic hybridization to survey genomic sequence divergence across species: a proof-of-concept from Drosophila.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Analysis of the genome content of Lactococcus garvieae by genomic interspecies microarray hybridization.BMC microbiology · 2010Article
- Microarray comparative genomic hybridisation analysis incorporating genomic organisation, and application to enterobacterial plant pathogens.PLoS computational biology · 2009Article
- Effect of FliK mutation on the transcriptional activity of the {sigma}54 sigma factor RpoN in Helicobacter pylori.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2009Article
- Improved analysis of bacterial CGH data beyond the log-ratio paradigm.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- PreP+07: improvements of a user friendly tool to preprocess and analyse microarray data.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArray-based comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) is commonly used to determine the genomic content of bacterial strains. Since prokaryotes in general have less conserved genome sequences than eukaryotes, sequence divergences between the genes in the genomes used for an aCGH experiment obstruct determination of genome variations (e.g. deletions). Current normalization methods do not take into consideration sequence divergence between target and microarray features and therefore cannot distinguish a difference in signal due to systematic errors in the data or due to sequence divergence.
resultsWe present supervised Lowess, or S-Lowess, an application of the subset Lowess normalization method. By using a predicted subset of array features with minimal sequence divergence between the analyzed strains for the normalization procedure we remove systematic errors from dual-dye aCGH data in two steps: (1) determination of a subset of conserved genes (i.e. likely conserved genes, LCG); and (2) using the LCG for subset Lowess normalization. Subset Lowess determines the correction factors for systematic errors in the subset of array features and normalizes all array features using these correction factors. The performance of S-Lowess was assessed on aCGH experiments in which differentially labeled genomic DNA fragments of Lactococcus lactis IL1403 and L. lactis MG1363 strains were hybridized to IL1403 DNA microarrays. Since both genomes are sequenced and gene deletions identified, the success rate of different aCGH normalization methods in detecting these deletions in the MG1363 genome were determined. S-Lowess detects 97% of the deletions, whereas other aCGH normalization methods detect up to only 60% of the deletions.
conclusionS-Lowess is implemented in a user-friendly web-tool accessible from http://bioinformatics.biol.rug.nl/websoftware/s-lowess. We demonstrate that it outperforms existing normalization methods and maximizes detection of genomic variation (e.g. deletions) from microbial aCGH data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.