ReviewThe Journal of chemical physics2008
Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields.
Review in The Journal of chemical physics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
235 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface Terminations of LaAlO3 Perovskite Nanoparticles as Viewed by Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Mechanically Interlocked Double-Walled Covalent Organic Framework with Cucurbit[8]Uril-Stabilized Viologen Radical Dimers.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Electron-Mediated Contrast Mechanisms in Biomedical Imaging: A Narrative Review and the Implication for Emerging Techniques.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tetra-substituted BDPA radicalsChemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- 14.1 T Liquid-StateJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Dynamic Nuclear Polarization EnhancedThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026Article
- Frequency super-resolution with quantum environment engineering in a weakly coupled three-nuclear-spin system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Time-resolved solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance studies of amyloid-β oligomer formation.Methods in enzymology · 2026Review
- Arg-Tyr cation-π interactions drive phase separation and β-sheet assembly in native spider dragline silk.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Atomic Structure of GNNQQNY Nanocrystals: A Validated Approach for Polymorphic Amyloids.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Revealing structure and shaping priorities in plant and fungal cell wall architecture via solid-state NMR.Cell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Isotropic Hyperfine Interactions Drive Cross-Effect Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Clustering and Heterogeneous P1 Distributions in Diamond Govern DNP Mechanisms at 6.9 and 13.8 T.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Residue-Resolved Liquid-State Hyperpolarized NMR of Peptide Condensate Surfaces.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Decoding structural transitions from CdSe nanoclusters to quantum dots through dynamic nuclear polarization NMR.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy with Overhauser Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025Article
- Dynamic nuclear polarization and chemically induced hyperpolarization: Progress, mechanisms, and opportunities.Magnetic resonance letters · 2025Review
- Systematic Evaluation of Polarizing Agents for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhanced NMR.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Position-Specific Substitution in Cellulose Ethers Studied by DNP Enhanced Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2025Article
- Toward Generalized Solution-StateThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is a method that permits NMR signal intensities of solids and liquids to be enhanced significantly, and is therefore potentially an important tool in structural and mechanistic studies of biologically relevant molecules. During a DNP experiment, the large polarization of an exogeneous or endogeneous unpaired electron is transferred to the nuclei of interest (I) by microwave (microw) irradiation of the sample. The maximum theoretical enhancement achievable is given by the gyromagnetic ratios (gamma(e)gamma(l)), being approximately 660 for protons. In the early 1950s, the DNP phenomenon was demonstrated experimentally, and intensively investigated in the following four decades, primarily at low magnetic fields. This review focuses on recent developments in the field of DNP with a special emphasis on work done at high magnetic fields (> or =5 T), the regime where contemporary NMR experiments are performed. After a brief historical survey, we present a review of the classical continuous wave (cw) DNP mechanisms-the Overhauser effect, the solid effect, the cross effect, and thermal mixing. A special section is devoted to the theory of coherent polarization transfer mechanisms, since they are potentially more efficient at high fields than classical polarization schemes. The implementation of DNP at high magnetic fields has required the development and improvement of new and existing instrumentation. Therefore, we also review some recent developments in microw and probe technology, followed by an overview of DNP applications in biological solids and liquids. Finally, we outline some possible areas for future developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.