Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18264718›Full record

ReviewMedical microbiology and immunology2008

Differences between mouse and human cytomegalovirus interactions with their respective hosts at immediate early times of the replication cycle.

Gerd G Maul, Dmitri Negorev

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mouse Models for Human Herpesviruses.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cytomegalovirus immune evasion of myeloid lineage cells.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2015
    Review
  6. Human cytomegalovirus riding the cell cycle.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Murine cytomegalovirus IE3 protein interacts with Ankrd17.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2011
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerd G MaulThe Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. maul@wistar.org
Dmitri Negorev
The Wistar Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of the mouse model of cytomegalovirus (CMV) research lies in a cost effective way to obtain significant data in in vivo settings. Keeping that promise requires a high degree of equivalency in the human and mouse virus. While genomic structure and many common proteins suggest that this system is appropriate to develop and test concepts in an organismal context, areas of difference have not been evaluated. Here we show that the major immediate early protein 1 (IE1) in MCMV binds the repressor Daxx suggesting that it serves a function performed by pp71 in HCMV. A Daxx binding pp71 equivalent at M82 could not be identified for MCMV. Differences in the mouse and human interferon upregulation of Daxx may have driven the need to have a Daxx-defeating function during reactivation, when pp71 is not present. The major immediate early protein 1 also differs in its chromatin binding properties between the two viruses. MCMV IE1 does not bind to chromatin, but HCMV IE1 does. It remains unclear whether this difference is functionally significant. The HCMV major immediate early protein 2 and its MCMV equivalent IE3 differ in their effect on the cell cycle; HCMV IE2 blocks the cell cycle, but MCMV IE3 does not, allowing MCMV to spread in infected mouse cells by cell division with continued expression of the major transactivating viral proteins. Actively transcribing genomes inducing immediate transcript environments are usually silenced and diminish during cell cycle progression. However, a recognizable desilencing and increase in immediate transcript environments takes place immediately after mitosis in MCMV infected cells. This raises the possibility that desilencing happens during tissue transplantation, wound healing, or other injury where cells are induced to proliferate.

Indexed as

Genes, Immediate-EarlyHost-Pathogen InteractionsVirus ReplicationAnimalsCytomegalovirusHumansMiceMuromegalovirus

Identifiers

PMID18264718
OpenAlexW2026696908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.