Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18260514›Full record

ArticleJournal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology2007

Co-circulating microorganisms in questing Ixodes scapularis nymphs in Maryland.

Katherine I Swanson, Douglas E Norris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cryptic Genes for Interbacterial Antagonism DistinguishFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TheFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  9. Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  10. Co-infection of Ticks: The Rule Rather Than the Exception.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Data-model fusion to better understand emerging pathogens and improve infectious disease forecasting.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine I SwansonW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Douglas E Norris
Bloomberg (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Traning Program in Environmental Health SciencesT32ES007141 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Marsha Wills-Karp · 1985 to 2026
$22.2M
Training: Molecular & Cellular Bases of Infectious DiseasesT32AI007417 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Arturo Casadevall · 1994 to 2026
$11.9M
CDC HHS U50/CCU319554NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007417NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007141NIEHS NIH HHS T32ES07141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ixodes scapularis can be infected with Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella spp., Babesia microti, and Rickettsia spp., including spotted-fever group Rickettsia. As all of these microorganisms have been reported in Maryland, the potential for these ticks to have concurrent infections exists in this region. To assess the frequency of these complex infections, 348 I. scapularis nymphs collected in 2003 were screened for these microorganisms by PCR with positives being confirmed by DNA sequencing. Borrelia burgdorferi was detected in 14.7% of nymphs. Anaplasma phagocytophilum (0.3%), Rickettsia spp. (19.5%), and an uncategorized agent (0.9%) was also detected. Dual infections were detected with B. burgdorferi and Rickettsia spp. as well as a triple infection with B. burgdorferi, Rickettsia spp., and an uncategorized agent. Infections with B. burgdorferi and Rickettsia spp. were statistically independent of one another. However, infection with B. burgdorferi and any one of these other microorganisms appears to occur more frequently than by chance alone, probably as a result of shared enzootic cycles. This study confirms that multiple microorganisms co-circulate with B. burgdorferi in I. scapularis in Maryland and demonstrates that Rickettsia spp. and B. burgdorferi circulate independently and at nearly equal frequencies, while A. phagocytophilum and other unrecognized organisms are less common.

Indexed as

AnimalsArachnid VectorsBacteriaDNA, BacterialGenes, BacterialIxodesMarylandNymphPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID18260514
PMCPMC4158432
OpenAlexW2179795809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.