ReviewThe Journal of membrane biology2008
Fluid transport: a guide for the perplexed.
Review in The Journal of membrane biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrostatic pressure as a driver of cell and tissue morphogenesis.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022Review
- Calcium Dynamics and Water Transport in Salivary Acinar Cells.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2021Review
- On the Effects of Mechanical Stress of Biological Membranes in Modeling of Swelling Dynamics of Biological Systems.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Transcriptomic and Network Analysis Identifies Shared and Unique Pathways across Dementia Spectrum Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- How Do Antihypertensive Drugs Work? Insights from Studies of the Renal Regulation of Arterial Blood Pressure.Frontiers in physiology · 2016Review
- Response to "What do aquaporin knockout studies tell us about fluid transport in epithelia?" Maclaren OJ, Sneyd J, Crampin EJ (2013) J Membr Biol 246:297-305.The Journal of membrane biology · 2013Article
- What do aquaporin knockout studies tell us about fluid transport in epithelia?The Journal of membrane biology · 2013Article
- Biophysical model of ion transport across human respiratory epithelia allows quantification of ion permeabilities.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- Efficiency of primary saliva secretion: an analysis of parameter dependence in dynamic single-cell and acinus models, with application to aquaporin knockout studies.The Journal of membrane biology · 2012Article
- Osmoregulation and epithelial water transport: lessons from the intestine of marine teleost fish.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2012Review
- Water-transporting proteins.The Journal of membrane biology · 2010Review
- Dynamic regulation of barrier integrity of the corneal endothelium.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2010Review
- Frequency spectrum of transepithelial potential difference reveals transport-related oscillations.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Readers of the physiological literature may be excused if they feel that fluid transport has become a complex and confusing field that is difficult to understand and to assess. The major theories of fluid-transporting epithelia are examined here with respect to their ability to explain quasi-isotonic fluid transport and its modulation by salt transport, osmotic permeability and basal tonicity. The basics of each theory are set out concisely, and their pros and cons are made explicit. Finally, a comparison is made in table form indicating their overall performance in relation to the problems of this difficult but important field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18259799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.