Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18259047›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2008

How sensitive are multilevel regression findings to defined area of context?: a case study of mammography use in California.

Lee R Mobley, Tzy-Mey May Kuo, Linda Andrews

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neighbourhood Income Inequality and General Psychopathology at 3-Years of Age.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Modeling Geospatial Patterns of Late-Stage Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in the US.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development of a cross-cultural deprivation index in five European countries.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Self-rated health and residential segregation: how does race/ethnicity matter?Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lee R MobleyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. lmobley@rti.org
Tzy-Mey May Kuo
Linda Andrews

Funding

Geospatial Factors & Impacts: Measurement and UseR01CA126858 · NCI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI ANSELIN, LUC, MOBLEY, LEE R · 2007 to 2015
$3.4M
Spatial Impact Factors and Mammography ScreeningR21CA117869 · NCI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MOBLEY, LEE RIVERS · 2005 to 2006
$297k
NCI NIH HHS 1 R21 CA117869NCI NIH HHS R01 CA126858NCI NIH HHS R21 CA117869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors develop a hybrid model of health care use that blends features of the traditional Aday-Andersen behavioral model with the socioecological modeling perspective. They use the model to conceptualize the various levels of influence expected from socioecological variables in individuals' mammography use decisions, build contextual variables from fine-grained data into four different types of geographic areas, and then use two- and three-level modeling of personal and area-level contextual factors to explain observed behavior. The central focus is on whether differentiating the conceptualized levels of influence seems to materially affect regression findings. The test could conceivably be confounded by the modifiable areal unit problem, but little evidence for this is found. Findings for California women suggest that distinctions do matter in how the levels of influence are defined for local neighborhood contextual factors. Studies using only county-level contextual factors will miss some meaningful associations related to interpersonal/proximate-level factors.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPatient Acceptance of Health CareRegression AnalysisAgedCaliforniaConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSEER ProgramSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID18259047
PMCPMC2678861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.