Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18258966›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008

Payment for performance in health care.

Russell Mannion, Huw T O Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Italian interregional performance evaluation system.Research in health services & regions · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The economics of alternative payment models for pharmaceuticals.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  9. How can Saudi Arabia reform its public hospital payment models? A narrative review.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Impact assessment of a pay-for-performance program on breast cancer screening in France using micro data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. The true impact of the French pay-for-performance program on physicians' benzodiazepines prescription behavior.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Patients' views on pay for performance in France: a qualitative study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Russell MannionCentre for Health and Public Services Management, University of York, York. rm15@york.ac.uk
Huw T O Davies

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Salaries and Fringe BenefitsEmployee Performance AppraisalHealth PersonnelProfessional PracticeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID18258966
PMCPMC2234517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.