ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2008
Molecular typing of Australian Scedosporium isolates showing genetic variability and numerous S. aurantiacum.
Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three annotated chromosome-level de novo genome assemblies of Lomentospora prolificans provide evidence for a chromosomal translocation event.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- First environmental survey ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis: modern perspectives on these difficult-to-treat rare mold infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Disseminated Infection by Scedosporium/Lomentospora during Induction Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Complicated by Nontuberculous Mycobacteria.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- A Lateral-Flow Device for the Rapid Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- In depth search of the Sequence Read Archive database reveals global distribution of the emerging pathogenic fungus Scedosporium aurantiacum.Medical mycology · 2022Article
- Article
- Multilocus Sequence Typing Reveals Extensive Genetic Diversity of the Emerging Fungal PathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Respiratory Fungal Diseases in Adult Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2019Review
- Article
- Challenges in Laboratory Detection of Fungal Pathogens in the Airways of Cystic Fibrosis Patients.Mycopathologia · 2018Article
- Investigating Clinical Issues by Genotyping of Medically Important Fungi: Why and How?Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017Review
- The genomic study of an environmental isolate ofStandards in genomic sciences · 2017Article
- Article
- Performance of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Identification of Aspergillus, Scedosporium, and Fusarium spp. in the Australian Clinical Setting.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Phenotypic profiling of Scedosporium aurantiacum, an opportunistic pathogen colonizing human lungs.PloS one · 2015Article
- Impact of multidrug-resistant organisms on patients considered for lung transplantation.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2013Review
- The airway microbiota in cystic fibrosis: a complex fungal and bacterial community--implications for therapeutic management.PloS one · 2012Article
- Fatal mycotic aneurysms due to Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One hundred clinical isolates from a prospective nationwide study of scedosporiosis in Australia (2003-2005) and 46 additional isolates were genotyped by internal transcribed spacer-restriction fragment length polymorphism (ITS-RFLP) analysis, ITS sequencing, and M13 PCR fingerprinting. ITS-RFLP and PCR fingerprinting identified 3 distinct genetic groups. The first group corresponded to Scedosporium prolificans (n = 83), and the other 2 comprised isolates previously identified as S. apiospermum: one of these corresponded to S. apiospermum (n = 33) and the other to the newly described species S. aurantiacum (n = 30). Intraspecies variation was highest for S. apiospermum (58%), followed by S. prolificans (45%) and S. aurantiacum (28%) as determined by PCR fingerprinting. ITS sequence variation of 2.2% was observed among S. apiospermum isolates. No correlation was found between genotype of strains and their geographic origin, body site from which they were cultured, or colonization versus invasive disease. Twelve S. prolificans isolates from 2 suspected case clusters were examined by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. No specific clusters were confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.