Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18257596›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2008

Are inhaled systemic therapies a viable option for the treatment of the elderly patient?

Stephen Allen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen AllenDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, The Royal Bournemouth Hospital and University of Bournemouth, Bournemouth, UK. Stephen.allen@rbch.nhs.uk
Royal Bournemouth Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although inhalation has been used as a route for the delivery of systemic drugs for millennia, the recent emergence of fine milling and nano-technology methods has extended the range of potential therapies that can be absorbed from the alveolar surface. Administration of insulin by inhalation has attracted particular attention. However, there has been very little research into the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of such new inhaled substances in elderly patients and the effects of lung aging and co-pathologies are not known, particularly in the very old. Furthermore, it has been shown that the decrements in cognition, praxis and executive function that are highly prevalent in frail elderly people have a profoundly detrimental effect on inhaler technique. Consequently, it is likely that a large proportion of elderly patients would not be able to use drugs targeted for alveolar absorption because accurate and reliable inhalation performance would not be achieved. On the other hand, it is expected that cognitively intact older people with good neurological, pulmonary and musculoskeletal performance would be able to use inhaled treatments in the same manner as younger individuals. In frail old age, and in patients with unreliable deep inhalation techniques, there might be more scope for the use of inhaled preparations for mucosal absorption from the nasal passages and upper airways. Indeed, the number of drugs under consideration for that mode of application is growing. This article focuses on the potential use of inhaled systemic treatments in old age and the physical and cognitive problems that might limit their use in that group of patients.

Indexed as

Nebulizers and VaporizersTechnology, PharmaceuticalAdministration, InhalationAerosolsAgedAge FactorsCognition DisordersHumansMucous MembranePharmaceutical PreparationsAerosolsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID18257596
OpenAlexW2020482513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.