ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2008
[Monitoring of AMD patients on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. Practical notes on functional and anatomical examination parameters from drug approval studies, specialist information and case series].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-occlusive reactive hyperemia and skeletal muscle capillary hemodynamics.Microvascular research · 2022Article
- Article
- [Retinal angiomatous proliferation with associated pigment epithelium detachment: anti-VEGF therapy].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2011Article
- [Visual self-assessment with the ACTO test during follow-up of AMD patients after intravitreal injections].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the most common causes of blindness in western industrialised nations. Most AMD patients suffer from the dry early form of AMD; however, wet AMD with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the main cause of blindness in all AMD patients. New prospects have been developed in AMD treatment using pharmacological methods available for treating all subtypes of exudative AMD. A number of inhibiting and inducing growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), are particularly important in the pathophysiology of wet AMD. The secreted VEGF appears to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of CNV and macular edemas as a result of its angiogenetic and permeability-enhancing effect. This recognition led to the treatment approach now used, i.e., competitive VEGF blocking through intravitreal adminsitration of anti-VEGF drugs. The anti-VEGF durgs lead to a rapid decrease in retinal thickness. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a valuable monitoring tool, but may only be used to assist in decision-making. Clinical follow-up of patients and further treatment recommendations must always be guided by the overall clinical picture. Visual acuity is regarded as the decisive criterion for repeat treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18256841What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.