Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18256586›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2008

Clinical pharmacology of cancer therapies in older adults.

A Hurria, S M Lichtman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Senior adult oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2012
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2010
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Systemic therapy strategies for elderly patients with gastric cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A HurriaThe Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA. ahurria@coh.org
S M Lichtman

Funding

Can Geriatric Assessment Predict Oncology Outcomes?K23AG026749 · NIA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI HURRIA, ARTI · 2005 to 2009
$874k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG026749NIA NIH HHS K23 AG026749-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This abbreviated review outlines the physiologic changes associated with aging, and examines how these changes may affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer therapies. We also provide an overview of studies that have been conducted evaluating the pharmacology of anticancer therapies in older adults, and issue a call for further research.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgingAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID18256586
PMCPMC2243152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.