Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18256234›Full record

ArticleGenome research2008

Analysis of sequence variability in the macronuclear DNA of Paramecium tetraurelia: a somatic view of the germline.

Laurent Duret, Jean Cohen, Claire Jubin, Philippe Dessen, Jean-François Goût, Sylvain Mousset, Jean-Marc Aury, Olivier Jaillon, Benjamin Noël, Olivier Arnaiz and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Programmed genome rearrangements in ciliates.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolutionary origins and impacts of genome architecture in ciliates.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Laurent DuretUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne F-69622, France.
Jean Cohen
Claire Jubin
Philippe Dessen
Jean-François Goût
Sylvain Mousset
Jean-Marc Aury
Olivier Jaillon
Benjamin Noël
Olivier Arnaiz
Mireille Bétermier
Patrick Wincker
Eric Meyer
Linda Sperling
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ciliates are the only unicellular eukaryotes known to separate germinal and somatic functions. Diploid but silent micronuclei transmit the genetic information to the next sexual generation. Polyploid macronuclei express the genetic information from a streamlined version of the genome but are replaced at each sexual generation. The macronuclear genome of Paramecium tetraurelia was recently sequenced by a shotgun approach, providing access to the gene repertoire. The 72-Mb assembly represents a consensus sequence for the somatic DNA, which is produced after sexual events by reproducible rearrangements of the zygotic genome involving elimination of repeated sequences, precise excision of unique-copy internal eliminated sequences (IES), and amplification of the cellular genes to high copy number. We report use of the shotgun sequencing data (>10(6) reads representing 13 x coverage of a completely homozygous clone) to evaluate variability in the somatic DNA produced by these developmental genome rearrangements. Although DNA amplification appears uniform, both of the DNA elimination processes produce sequence heterogeneity. The variability that arises from IES excision allowed identification of hundreds of putative new IESs, compared to 42 that were previously known, and revealed cases of erroneous excision of segments of coding sequences. We demonstrate that IESs in coding regions are under selective pressure to introduce premature termination of translation in case of excision failure.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsBase CompositionChromosomesDNA, ProtozoanGene AmplificationMacronucleusMicronucleus, GermlineParamecium tetraureliaSequence Analysis, DNASequence DeletionDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID18256234
PMCPMC2279246
OpenAlexW2122087169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.