Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18254121›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Inhaled nitric oxide for acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease.

A Al Hajeri, G R Serjeant, Z Fedorowicz

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Current management of sickle cell anemia.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Al HajeriMinistry of Health, Department of Genetics, Box 25438, Awali, BAHRAIN. alhajeriamani@gmail.com
G R Serjeant
Z Fedorowicz
Ministry of Health · BHUniversity of Bahrain · BH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute chest syndrome has been defined as a new infiltrate visible on chest radiograph associated with one or more symptoms, such as fever, cough, sputum production, tachypnea, dyspnea, or new-onset hypoxia. Symptoms and complications of this syndrome, whether of infectious or non-infectious origin, vary quite widely in people with sickle cell disease. Lung infection tends to predominate in children, whilst infarction appears more common in adults. However, these are often interrelated and may occur concurrently. The differences in clinical course and severity are suggestive of multiple causes for acute chest syndrome. Successful treatment depends principally on high-quality supportive care. The syndrome and its treatment have been extensively studied, but the response to antibiotics, anticoagulants, and other conventional therapies remains disappointing. The potential of inhaled nitric oxide as a treatment option has more recently provoked considerable interest. Nitric oxide appears to play a major role in both the regulation of vascular muscle tone at the cellular level and in platelet aggregation (clumping). Much of the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease is consistent with a mechanism of nitric oxide depletion and although there has been extensive research on the pathophysiology of acute chest syndrome, the possible therapeutic role of inhaled nitric oxide for acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease is still to be determined.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide for treating acute chest syndrome by comparing improvement in symptoms and clinical outcomes against standard care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearching of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. In July 2007 the following clinical trials registers were searched: ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov/); the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/trialsearch/); Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com/) and CLINICALTRIALS.COM (www.clinicaltrials.com/). Most recent search of the Trials Register: November 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of people with sickle cell disease suffering from acute chest syndrome, comparing the use of inhaled nitric oxide to placebo or standard care for any single or multiple treatment and over any time period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No studies identified were eligible for inclusion. MAIN

resultsNo studies identified were eligible for inclusion. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is a need for well-designed, adequately-powered randomised controlled trial to assess the benefits and risks of this form of treatment as an adjunct to established therapies.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAnemia, Sickle CellBronchodilator AgentsHumansNitric OxideRespiration DisordersSyndromeBronchodilator AgentsNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID18254121
PMCPMC8982151
OpenAlexW1576325686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.